Miles Parks, NPR's Voting correspondent, tackles the critical topic of misinformation in elections. He debunks common myths about non-citizen voting, revealing that only a few cases exist amidst millions. Parks discusses the political motivations behind these falsehoods and the strong safeguards protecting election integrity. He also sheds light on the intricate process of mail-in ballot counting in Pennsylvania, highlighting how delays could impact results. Finally, he presents a fascinating contrast between public fears about fraud and trust in local election workers.
The podcast highlights the tension between misleading narratives about voter fraud, particularly from Trump, and the reality of rare incidents of non-citizen voting.
It discusses the polarized public opinion on mail-in voting, where allegations of fraud persist despite election officials assuring robust safeguards are in place.
Deep dives
Election Integrity and Misinformation
Concerns regarding election integrity have surged as the presidential race approaches, with both major candidates expressing confidence in their campaigns despite a statistically tied polling landscape. Former President Trump has propagated narratives framing Democrats and non-citizens as threats to democracy, suggesting that they could lead to widespread election fraud. However, research consistently shows that non-citizen voting is extremely rare, with a recent audit in Georgia uncovering only 20 confirmed non-citizen voters out of over 8 million. This persistent narrative, despite its lack of evidence, plays a critical role in shaping partisan rhetoric around elections and has the potential to influence public perception and voter behavior.
Mail-In Voting and Fraud Claims
Discussions surrounding mail-in voting often highlight allegations of fraud, despite the rigorous safeguards in place that track each vote. Conservative commentators, including influential figures like Elon Musk, have raised suspicions about the legitimacy of mail-in ballots, although election officials maintain that any sporadic issues are typically resolved without wider implications. The reality is that while mail-in voting may present marginally greater risks for fraud, there has never been evidence of systemic cheating on a significant scale. Historical examples, such as the case in North Carolina's ninth congressional district where mail-in fraud was identified, demonstrate that the election system is equipped to address and rectify such occurrences.
Legal Challenges and Public Confidence
As the election nears, the Trump campaign and Republican National Committee have initiated various lawsuits aimed at challenging voting procedures and ensuring what they describe as 'only legal votes' are counted. These preemptive legal actions may set the stage for contesting election results should Trump lose, despite being standard practice during election cycles. Meanwhile, public opinion remains divided on issues of voter fraud, with a significant portion of Americans expressing concerns yet maintaining confidence in local election processes. This conflicting sentiment indicates a complex landscape where misinformation about election integrity persists, even as the trust in local election officials receives some optimism.
For this episode of Trump's Trials, host Scott Detrow speaks with NPR Voting correspondent Miles Parks.
In these closing days of the presidential election, polling across the board has nearly every swing state in a statistical tie, meaning the election may come down to just a couple thousands votes.
No matter who wins, in the coming days we're going to hear a lot more from Donald Trump and his allies about the results.
And if history is any guide we can expect a mix of misleading information, rumors and outright lies