What are the sources of the UK Constitution? Politips Explains

Erskine May's "Parliamentary Practice", also known as Erskine May, is a comprehensive guide to the procedures and conventions of the British Parliament. First published in 1844, it has undergone numerous revisions, with the 25th edition published in 2019. The book details the rules and customs governing parliamentary business, including debates, voting, and legislation. It serves as an essential resource for MPs, parliamentary staff, and anyone studying British parliamentary procedures. Its detailed explanations and historical context make it an invaluable tool for understanding the workings of the British legislature. The book's longevity and continued relevance demonstrate its enduring importance as a guide to parliamentary practice.

A. V. Dicey's "Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution" is a foundational text in British constitutional law. Published in 1885, it explores key principles of the British system, notably parliamentary sovereignty. Dicey's work emphasizes the supremacy of Parliament and its ability to make and unmake laws without constraint. The book also examines the rule of law and the relationship between the government and the judiciary. It remains a significant contribution to constitutional scholarship, influencing legal and political thought for over a century. Its analysis of parliamentary sovereignty continues to be debated and refined in contemporary constitutional discussions.

Walter Bagehot's "The English Constitution" is a seminal work that analyzes the British political system. Published in 1867, it offers insights into the workings of the cabinet, parliament, and the monarchy. Bagehot's analysis distinguishes between the 'dignified' part of the constitution (the monarchy) and the 'efficient' part (the cabinet), highlighting the balance of power and influence. The book remains relevant today for its insightful observations on the evolution of British governance. It continues to be studied by political scientists and historians for its historical context and enduring relevance to constitutional theory. Bagehot's work is considered a classic in the field of political science.