Coding Over Cocktails

What’s wrong with SOLID and Test Driven Development with Daniel Terhorst-North

Apr 12, 2022

44:19

Creator website

Episode guests

Daniel Terhorst-North

Highlights

AI Chapters

Episode notes

I'm in my id e. I've got hot reloading of aps, right?

01:25

Single Responsibility Conversation

01:25

How to Write a Model Client

01:19

Compose Ability

01:53

Introduction

3min

What Is Solid and What's Your Problem?

5min

Code Navigation in C Plus Plus Code

2min

Using Single Responsibility Principle

3min

What Is Simple Code?

3min

Compose Over Inheritance

5min

Cloger Is a Massive Idiomatic Language

2min

I'm Not Saying, "I'm a Bad Programmer"

4min

Code for a Code That Doesn't Exist Yet

4min

10.

Then I'm Gonna Write a Functonal Speck. Where's Dan?

5min

11.

The Biggest Risk With T D D

3min

12.

BDD

6min

While SOLID is the known standard when it comes to software design and architecture, it may be hard to apply for some as it limits developers to specific techniques in going about it. In this episode, Daniel Terhorst-North, originator of Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD)and Deliberate Discovery, presents his arguments on why SOLID isn't exactly the best bet when if comes to design principles, offering an alternative that can help against the misapplications of various agile practices.

Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts

Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.