The Joe Pomp Show Why the NFL Refuses to Ditch Turf Fields (Even as Players Keep Getting Hurt)
Oct 8, 2025
NFL players are raising alarms about the danger of turf fields, citing a worrying spike in injuries, particularly at MetLife Stadium. While turf installation and maintenance costs are lower, the revenue generated from non-NFL events like concerts significantly outweighs any concerns for player safety. Owners focus on profit, creating a divide with players who prioritize safety. Innovative solutions like retractable pitches are on the horizon, but misaligned incentives keep the debate ongoing as both sides seek their own interests.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
High-Profile Injuries At MetLife
- Malik Nabors' recent knee injury reignited turf safety concerns after many major tears at MetLife Stadium.
- The host lists high-profile players who suffered ACL/Achilles tears on turf, linking injuries to stadium surface patterns.
Grass Is Safer But Turf Is Cheaper Over Time
- Data strongly suggests natural grass is safer, but the economics complicate decisions.
- Artificial turf costs $1–2M to install and saves teams hundreds of thousands per year on maintenance when amortized.
Turf Boosts Venue Utilization
- Turf enables far more non-football events because it needs minimal recovery time.
- MetLife can host ~40 events yearly on turf versus ~14 on grass, massively increasing venue utilization.