06/07/24: Redo of Stanford study of LexisNexis and TR, Scarlett Johansen & Sexbot Overlords, & more
Jun 13, 2024
auto_awesome
Scarlett Johansen joins legal tech journalists to discuss redo of Stanford study on AI legal tools, chatGPT in court, prompts vs. precedents, & societal impacts of AI voices in entertainment industry
The redo of Stanford study critiqued methodologies in evaluating AI legal research tools.
Ethical concerns highlighted on AI voice interfaces resembling Scarlett Johansson in legal tech.
Deep dives
Legal Tech Week Panelists Discuss Stanford Hallucination Study Results
The panelists discussed the results of the Stanford Hallucination Study, highlighting shortcomings in the evaluation of Westlaw Precision by Thomson Reuters. They questioned the methodology and knowledge base of the study authors, suggesting potential flaws in their legal training. A debate ensued regarding the definition of 'inaccurate answers' and the importance of thorough legal research.
Legal Tech Experts Analyze Judge's Use of Chat GPT in Legal Reasoning
The episode addressed a judge's unique approach to leveraging Chat GPT for legal reasoning in a concurrence involving the interpretation of the term 'landscaping.' The panelists debated the relevance of utilizing AI tools in legal decision-making and the implications of integrating innovative technologies like Chat GPT in judicial contexts.
Ethical Concerns Raised Over OpenAI's AI Voice Interface
The conversation delved into ethical considerations surrounding OpenAI's AI voice interface, particularly focusing on the use of a submissive and flirtatious female voice resembling Scarlett Johansson in the 'Her' movie. Panelists criticized the tone and demeanor of the AI voice, highlighting concerns of reinforcing harmful stereotypes and inappropriate interactions.
Impacts of Targeted Drone Surveillance by Police Departments
A significant story on police department's use of drone surveillance was highlighted, pointing out the potential implications of targeted surveillance on privacy and civil rights. The discussion underscored the need for further exploration of the ethical and legal ramifications associated with drone surveillance practices.