How Did This Get Made? Last Looks: My Boyfriend's Back
Nov 21, 2025
In this lively discussion, Gen-Z intern Quinn Jennings, who's passionate about rising talent, shares her insights on Vanity Fair’s representation of actors. The trio dives into the Geek Squad debate, separating established faces from fresh contenders. Quinn suggests her own picks and critiques the magazine's choices, questioning the 'boys' label. They explore age dynamics, casting omissions, and reminisce about nostalgic film formats. Tune in for a fun mix of humor and hot takes on Hollywood's evolving landscape!
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Vanity Fair Missed The Mark
- Vanity Fair's "boys" covers try to define a new class of leading men but feel like a tonal misfire to older observers.
- Paul Scheer argues the term 'boys' and the selection misses the real social vibe of rising actors.
Established Stars Look Out Of Place
- Many chosen actors (e.g., Michael B. Jordan, Riz Ahmed) feel already established rather than "up-and-coming."
- Paul and Jason see a mismatch between 'new leading men' and true rising talent.
Publicists Influence Cover Choices
- Publicists and career strategy shape whether actors accept group press stunts like being on a multi-person cover.
- Jason notes some actors decline group exposure to protect their brand or appear more serious.
