Under the Hood Ep. 57: Did Jesus Get a Fair Trial?
Dec 4, 2025
Dive into the dramatic night of Jesus' arrest, where five back-to-back trials reveal shocking legal irregularities. Discover why Jewish leaders sought crucifixion instead of stoning and the significance of the crowd's choice of Barabbas over Jesus. Learn how each trial broke Jewish law and the theological implications of Jesus’ voluntary submission to this injustice. Join the exploration of historical context, legal norms, and the profound meanings behind these events.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Two High Priests Operating Together
- Annas and Caiaphas functioned as two overlapping high-priest figures in Jesus' early interrogation.
- Will Bushman explains this resolves Gospel references to 'the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas.'
Early Trials Broke Jewish Legal Norms
- The initial trials used Jewish legal norms but repeatedly violated them to secure a conviction.
- Will Bushman notes Annas interrogated Jesus without presenting required witness testimony.
Silence Then Self-Affirmation Sealed Verdict
- At Caiaphas's hearing witnesses' testimonies conflicted and failed to convict until Jesus' own affirmation.
- Will Bushman highlights Jesus' silence and eventual answer that triggered a blasphemy verdict.