Nuclear Won’t Meet Tech’s Energy Demands w/ MV Ramana
Nov 28, 2024
auto_awesome
M.V. Ramana, a professor at the University of British Columbia and author of "Nuclear Is Not the Solution," discusses the tech industry's hopes of powering data centers with nuclear energy. He debunks the myth that nuclear is the silver bullet for climate issues and reveals the dangers of intertwining nuclear energy with weapons proliferation. Ramana also critiques financial motivations behind nuclear advocacy and emphasizes the urgent need to prioritize renewable energy over unreliable nuclear solutions in the fight against climate change.
The tech industry's push for nuclear energy reflects a desire to avoid deeper societal and economic reforms necessary for tackling climate change.
Despite pledges for sustainability, tech companies are struggling to reduce their carbon footprints as energy demands from data centers continue to rise.
The high costs and lengthy regulatory processes for nuclear energy raise concerns about its economic viability compared to emerging renewable alternatives.
Deep dives
Wealth Preservation Amid Climate Concerns
The tech industry's interest in nuclear energy stems from a desire to mitigate the societal demands for change driven by climate crises. Wealthy tech giants fear that climate change will prompt calls for substantial social and economic reforms that could threaten their fortunes and status. As a result, they promote the idea that technological advancements, such as nuclear power, can provide solutions without necessitating deep structural changes. This obsession with technological solutions serves to protect their interests and distract from the necessity of more equitable and sustainable societal transformations.
Nuclear Power's Rising Energy Demands
Tech companies are experiencing significant increases in energy demands due to their extensive operations, particularly for data centers that power AI advancements. In light of sustainability pledges, these companies are under pressure to address their carbon footprints, yet their emissions continue to rise. Despite their claims of transitioning to cleaner energy sources, skepticism arises regarding their commitment, as nuclear energy cannot be implemented in a timely manner to meet current needs. Instead, the focus on nuclear could be an attempt to create a narrative of responsibility while failing to act meaningfully in the present.
Skepticism about the Viability of Nuclear Solutions
The promise made by tech companies to advance nuclear technology needs to be approached with caution, particularly regarding the development of small modular reactors and other new designs. Many of these touted innovations are simply rehashes of older reactor concepts that have not proven successful in addressing historical issues. Moreover, the lengthy regulatory processes and extensive funding required to bring new designs to fruition underscore the unrealistic timelines presented by these companies. Ultimately, without significant investment and commitment to genuinely developing new technologies, these solutions may remain illusory.
Cost Concerns Surrounding Nuclear Energy
Nuclear energy is associated with substantial expenses, not only for construction and operation but also due to unforeseen technical and regulatory challenges. Even though some proponents argue it can provide stable energy over decades, the reality is that high investment costs coupled with market competition from renewable energy options lead to nuclear being an economically uncompetitive choice. The long lead times for construction and regulatory approval further exacerbate its effectiveness in combating immediate climate challenges. This economic factor should lead to scrutiny and reevaluation of nuclear energy's role in future energy strategies.
The Interconnection of Nuclear Energy and Proliferation
The relationship between nuclear energy and nuclear weapons proliferation poses significant ethical and political dilemmas. Nuclear reactors not only produce power but also create materials, such as plutonium, that can be diverted for military use. Additionally, the technical expertise and infrastructure developed for nuclear energy can inadvertently support the creation of nuclear weapons in non-nuclear states. This dual use of technology necessitates a profound consideration of the long-term implications of expanding nuclear energy as a solution to climate concerns.
Paris Marx is joined by MV Ramana to discuss the tech industry’s push to have nuclear energy power its data centers and why the reality of nuclear power isn’t as great as its promoters often make it seem.
Tech Won’t Save Us offers a critical perspective on tech, its worldview, and wider society with the goal of inspiring people to demand better tech and a better world. Support the show on Patreon.
The podcast is made in partnership with The Nation. Production is by Eric Wickham. Transcripts are by Brigitte Pawliw-Fry.