Naked Bible 205: The Sword and the Servant with David Burnett
Mar 3, 2018
auto_awesome
Biblical scholar David Burnett joins the podcast to discuss the enigmatic 'two swords' passage of Luke 22:35-38. They explore different interpretations and the controversy around this text. They also delve into Luke's perspective, the cosmic confrontation between Satan and Jesus, the non-violent approach of the Messiah, and the disciples' denial of Jesus. The hosts express appreciation for the guest and discuss intertextuality and swords.
The command to sell cloaks and buy swords in Luke 22:35-38 is a prophetic enactment of the disciples' denial of Jesus, symbolizing their abandonment and betrayal.
Luke employs irony and role reversal in his narrative, portraying the disciples, who should fear the robbers, as taking up swords and acting as robbers themselves.
Luke's theological framework focuses on scriptural fulfillment, emphasizing salvation through faithfulness unto death rather than resorting to violence or armed resistance.
Deep dives
The Prophetic Enactment of Denial
In this podcast episode, the guest discusses a difficult and controversial passage from Luke 22:35-38. He proposes a different interpretation of the passage, suggesting that the command to sell cloaks and buy swords is a prophetic enactment of the disciples' denial of Jesus. The structure of the narrative supports this idea, with Peter's denial being foretold and then the disciples collectively taking up swords, symbolizing their denial. Jesus rebukes the disciples when one of them strikes with a sword and even heals an enemy, highlighting the contrast between their actions and the message of Isaiah 53. The guest argues that Luke arranges the material to emphasize the disciples' denial and the fulfillment of scripture.
The Inversion of Roles
The podcast episode further explores the themes of denial and armed resistance in Luke 22. It highlights the irony of the disciples, who should be fearing the robbers, taking up swords and acting like robbers themselves. This inversion of roles is captured in Luke's unique use of the term 'robbers' throughout the passage. The Good Samaritan parable and the cleansing of the temple scene also contribute to this narrative thread. Jesus confronts those who come at him with swords and clubs, calling them robbers. This sets the stage for his arrest and crucifixion, where he is left alone, paralleling the suffering servant in Isaiah 53.
The Cosmic Clash and Luke's Theological Framework
Lastly, the podcast episode delves into the wider theological framework in Luke's gospel. It highlights the cosmic clash between Jesus and Satan, emphasizing the unique narrative elements in Luke, such as Satan's demand to sift the disciples and the absence of angelic ministration after Jesus' temptation. The guest argues that Luke strategically restructures the material to frame the story as a great temptation, with Satan incarnate in Judas betraying Jesus. The episode also connects this theme to Jewish apocalyptic thought and the Jewish exegesis of Isaiah 53, presenting Jesus' actions as a reversal of the fallen angels' violence and a fulfillment of scripture.
Luke's Emphasis on Scriptural Fulfillment
Luke focuses on the idea of scriptural fulfillment in the disciple denial tradition. While Mark and Matthew use the text from Zachariah 13 to quote Jesus at the meal, Luke uses Isaiah 53. The fulfillment of scripture in these denial stories always occurs within the context of Jesus' arrest. Luke intentionally chooses different texts to convey the same message and emphasizes the importance of faithfulness to the point of death.
The Ethical Message of Luke's Teaching
Luke's theology centers around the idea that salvation comes through faithfulness unto death and not by taking up the sword. This ethical message is further reinforced in the book of Acts, where believers display the same faithfulness as Jesus. Luke challenges Christians to face their enemies without violence, relying on the power of God rather than physical weapons. This message may be difficult for Christians in the West, but it aligns with the witness of persecuted believers in other parts of the world.
The enigmatic “two swords” passage of Luke 22:35-38 that famously features Jesus’ command to the disciples, “the one who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one” (22:35), has long plagued biblical interpreters. Scholars have attempted to explain this passage in many ways. Some have suggested that Jesus was speaking figuratively, not speaking of buying literal swords, but alluding to the future persecution of the disciples. Some suggest Jesus was preparing them to take up swords to defend themselves after his departure, preparing them for bandits along the way. Along these lines, still others suggest Jesus was referring more generally to the time of trial to come after his resurrection. This passage has even featured prominently in modern debates regarding Christian positions on guns and violence, some evangelical voices going as far to suggest that Jesus by implication encourages the right to brandish and use fire arms. As such, this text has factored into discussion of Christian ethics. In this episode David Burnett returns to the podcast and offers a new approach, one that reframes the passage through a careful treatment of the text within its wider narrative context and Luke’s use of scripture.