Jeremy Black, "Rethinking Geopolitics" (Indiana UP, 2024)
Aug 17, 2024
auto_awesome
Jeremy Black, an esteemed historian and expert on geopolitics, dives deep into the shifting sands of global power dynamics. He discusses the potential for a major geopolitical realignment, likening today's situation to historical turning points, especially the insights of Halford Mackinder. Black critiques the contemporary misuse of geopolitics, emphasizing the need for a broader analysis beyond mere geography. He also contrasts naval and land power theories and explores the influential ideas shaping U.S. foreign policy from WWII onward.
The podcast emphasizes the necessity of reexamining geopolitical concepts through historical contexts to grasp contemporary challenges faced by powers like the US and UK.
It highlights the evolving nature of geopolitics, stressing that human geography and political dynamics significantly influence international relations beyond mere physical geography.
Deep dives
Revisiting Geopolitics
Geopolitics is defined as the spatial dimension of both international and domestic politics. The contemporary use of the term is critiqued for being excessively applied without a thoughtful analysis of its implications. The author emphasizes the need to reassess how geopolitics has evolved since the early 20th century by examining historical contexts, such as Britain's imperial past and modern American political challenges. The discussion highlights parallel themes of overstretch and the strategic assessment of competing global powers faced by both Britain and the United States.
The Complexity of Geopolitics
The idea that geopolitics has different meanings, describing it as 'polysimious,' suggests that physical geography alone cannot fully dictate political behavior or responses. Human geography introduces complexity; for instance, the relationship dynamics in similar physical environments, like North and South Korea, are influenced more by human actions and ideology than by geographical determinants. Factors such as resource distribution and geopolitical interests undergo continuous changes, showcasing the relationship between human activity and the physical environment. Historical examples, including the warming of the Arctic, illustrate how changes in geography can affect international competition and strategic interests.
Differentiating Geopolitics from Grand Strategy
Geopolitics is distinguished from grand strategy in that it encompasses more than state competition; it includes domestic responses to spatial considerations. Examples of this can be seen in how police forces may react differently to social upheaval in cities with comparable socio-economic conditions. This distinction emphasizes the importance of understanding the operational context of politics beyond the notion of strategic competition. The nuanced analysis invites consideration of how rhetoric surrounding geopolitics can sometimes blur the line between conceptual frameworks and actual political dynamics.
The Global Nature of Geopolitics
The perception of geopolitics has transitioned to a global context, wherein advanced technologies and instantaneous communication shape international relations and interactions. However, there remains a local aspect, as various political landscapes are influenced by their specific geographies and historical narratives. Inadequate consideration of geographical dimensions in political discourse, particularly within British and American contexts, limits the understanding of contemporary geopolitical complexities. The importance of geography as a permissive rather than deterministic force encourages deeper engagement with spatial factors in the analysis of global and local politics.
Amid the bloody Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2021 and the escalating tensions across the Taiwan Strait, the geopolitical balance of power has changed significantly in a very short period. If current trends continue, we may be witnessing a tectonic realignment unseen in more than a century.
In 1904, Halford Mackinder delivered a seminal lecture entitled "The Geographical Pivot of History" to a packed house at the Royal Geographical Society in London about the historic changes then taking place on the world stage. Britain was the great power of that historical moment, but its political, military, and economic primacy was under serious challenge from the United States, Germany, and Russia. Mackinder predicted that the "heartland" of Eastern Europe held the key to global hegemony and that the struggle for control over this region would be the next great conflict. Ten years later, when an assassin's bullet in Sarajevo launched the world into a calamitous war, Mackinder's analysis proved prescient.
As esteemed historian Jeremy Black argues in Rethinking Geopolitics (Indiana UP, 2024), the 2020s may be history's next great pivot point. The continued volatility of the global system in the wake of a deadly pandemic exacerbates these pressures. At the same time, the American public remains divided by the question of engagement with the outside world, testing the limits of US postwar hegemony. The time has come for a reconsideration of the 120 years from Mackinder's lecture to now, as well as geopolitics of the present and of the future.