The podcast discusses California's experience with affirmative action, exploring the impact of a previous ban on diversity in education. It also delves into the challenges to affirmative action in the Supreme Court, the UC system's stance on the issue, and efforts to diversify California's public schools without using race and gender as factors.
The podcast highlights the significant decrease in black and Hispanic admissions to public education in California after the ban on affirmative action in 1996.
The episode outlines the University of California's efforts to diversify their student body through alternative measures, such as considering income and socioeconomic status, guaranteeing admission to top-performing students, and implementing a comprehensive review process.
Deep dives
The Supreme Court's Impending Decision on Affirmative Action
The podcast episode discusses the Supreme Court's consideration to abolish affirmative action, with a case challenging its constitutionality. Schools are concerned about maintaining diversity without affirmative action, as it has been essential in higher education admissions for decades. The podcast highlights California's experience after banning affirmative action in 1996, resulting in a significant decrease in black and Hispanic admissions to public education. It emphasizes administrators' belief that nothing can fully replace affirmative action in diversifying college campuses.
Challenges to Affirmative Action and Arguments Against Its Use
The episode covers the challenges to affirmative action at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, brought by an organization called Students for Fair Admissions. The organization's founder argues that using race for admissions violates equal protection guarantees in the U.S. Constitution and the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The episode explains the expected timeline for the Supreme Court's decision on these challenges and underscores that the first significant blow against affirmative action came from a case in California in 1978.
California's Ban on Affirmative Action and Alternative Approaches to Diversity
The episode outlines the impact of Proposition 209 in California, which banned the use of race or gender in public education. It examines the decrease in diversity at top universities due to the ban, highlighting the efforts made by the University of California (UC) system to find alternative ways to diversify their student body. These efforts included considering income and socioeconomic status, guaranteeing admission to top-performing students, and implementing a comprehensive review process, which considers various factors beyond grades and test scores. The episode notes that while diversity has increased at UCs, advocates argue that it still does not fully reflect the state's diversity.
The Supreme Court appears ready to abolish affirmative action later this year. The case seeking to declare it unconstitutional has schools that consider race in admissions worried about how they can continue to build diversity among their students without affirmative action.
Here in California, though, we already know what happens when programs like affirmative action are banned. In 1996, voters passed a first ballot initiative in the country to ban the consideration of race or gender and public education.
Today, how the University of California system has dealt with a 25-year ban on affirmative action. And what we can learn if a national ban does happen. Read the full transcript here.