Dr. Richard Bosshardt Reveals Deadly Truth: Most Surgeons Aren’t Fit to Practice. Here’s Why.
Feb 28, 2025
auto_awesome
Dr. Richard Bosshardt, a board-certified surgeon with almost 40 years of experience, shares his critical views on the declining standards in surgery due to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. He discusses his ban from the American College of Surgeons for challenging these changes and asserts that they threaten patient safety. Bosshardt raises alarms over the next generation of surgeons, expressing concern about inadequate training and the ethical responsibilities of surgeons amidst politically charged medical practices.
Dr. Richard Bosshardt criticizes the medical industry's shift towards DEI initiatives, claiming it compromises the quality and standards of surgical training.
He argues that the notion of racial concordance in surgery lacks scientific evidence and promotes harmful segregation within healthcare.
Bosshardt emphasizes the urgent need to prioritize surgical excellence and maintain accountability in training programs to ensure competent future surgeons.
Deep dives
Contentious Relationship with the American College of Surgeons
The speaker discusses his ongoing conflict with the American College of Surgeons (ACS), which began after he expressed concerns about the organization's shift from prioritizing surgical excellence to emphasizing diversity and inclusion. He became a fellow of the ACS and practiced surgery for over 30 years before raising alarms about a lecture he read that focused solely on diversity, neglecting the concept of excellence. This led him to publish a commentary in the ACS bulletin, expressing his fears about how this shift could impact standards in the field of surgery. The polarization around these issues intensified following the George Floyd incident, leading to swift changes within the ACS that the speaker contends undermined surgical quality.
Allegations of Racial Bias and Discord
In response to perceived racism following national events, the ACS established a task force on racism, which led to claims that the organization and the practice of surgery were inherently racist. These claims were based on disparities observed in surgical outcomes between black and white patients, with the assertion that racial concordance—having surgeons of the same race as their patients—would improve care. The speaker challenges this idea, citing a lack of scientific evidence supporting the notion that race impacts surgical success, and argues that such thinking could lead to a regressive form of segregation in healthcare. He suggests that pushing this agenda is ultimately harmful and distracts from more pertinent issues affecting patient care.
Personal Activism Against Declining Standards
The speaker's shift to activism was unanticipated in his retirement but was spurred by what he saw as an encroachment of ideology into the medical field. He was particularly disturbed by the ACS's embrace of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs that he believed compromised surgical standards. He recounts his experience of being banned from ACS forums after voicing concerns about these initiatives, which he saw as detrimental to patient care and surgical excellence. His commitment to activism reflects a broader worry that current and future surgeons may be inadequately trained, compromising their ability to provide safe and effective care.
Concerns About Training Quality and Expertise
The declining quality in surgical training is a significant focus of the speaker’s critique, who notes that many residents come out of training programs lacking essential surgical skills. He highlights instances where fully trained surgeons did not possess the basic competencies expected from their training, asserting that the shortened residency hours have contributed to a lack of hands-on experience. There is alarm over the trend whereby current training programs allow residents to log observed procedures as part of their surgical experience, diluting the practical skills that are necessary for independent practice. This raises concerns about the readiness of new surgeons to operate competently upon entering the workforce.
A Call for Reform and Restored Integrity in Medicine
The speaker advocates for a return to a focus on excellence within medicine, urging that standards reemerge as the primary concern over ideologically driven agendas. He emphasizes the need for accountability within the ACS and the broader medical community, pushing for policies that prioritize patient care over political correctness. Additionally, he stresses the importance of ensuring that future surgeons possess adequate experience and training to meet high standards of medical competence. The overall message is a call to action for fellow surgeons and healthcare professionals to recognize the risks of the current ideological trends facing their field and to work towards reinstating integrity in surgical excellence.
Dr. Richard Bosshardt has been a board certified surgeon for nearly 40 years. He’s watched the DEI race crazies lower the standards to such a frightening degree that he no longer trusts doctors.
(00:00) Bosshardt’s War on DEI Within the Medical Industry
(04:47) The Left’s Mission to Segregate Surgeons
(11:03) Why They Banned Bosshardt From the American College of Surgeons
(24:41) How the Left Has Criminally Lowered the Standards for Surgeons