American History Hit America's Bloodiest General
Jan 5, 2026
Major Jonathan D. Bratten, command historian for the Maine National Guard and author of 'To The Last Man', dives into the grim legacy of America's bloodiest generals. He discusses the moral weight of command, contrasting Robert E. Lee's relentless tactics with Ulysses S. Grant's approach to ending conflict. Bratten also examines John Bell Hood's aggressive assaults, the technological shifts in modern warfare, and John Pershing's high-casualty decisions in the Meuse-Argonne offensive. Ultimately, Lee earns the title of the bloodiest general for his costly offensive strategies.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Moral Weight Of Command
- The moral weight of command defines generals: sending others into mortal danger is a core measure of leadership.
- Don Wildman frames casualty decisions as a defining, personal responsibility that outlasts tactical success.
Lee's Offensive Pursuit Of Decisive Victory
- Robert E. Lee sought decisive, offensive battles to force diplomatic recognition and quick victory.
- Jonathan D. Bratten argues Lee's aggressive strategy repeatedly consumed his own army through high casualties.
Grant Versus Lee: End Versus Prolong
- Ulysses S. Grant pursued action to end the war, while Lee often sought to continue fighting despite losses.
- Bratten contrasts Grant's willingness to negotiate to prevent bloodshed with Lee's persistence.
