Definitions of Inerrancy and Gospel Reportage

In which I explain how what I call the "reportage model" of the Gospels intersects with the doctrine of the inerrancy of the Bible. In fact, if you hold to inerrancy, you probably already believe the reportage model!  I also talk about how the attempt to make the compositional device views compatible with inerrancy creates confusion. What is the point in saying that a book that looks historical to all appearances is "inerrant" while holding a view that entails that it isn't literally reliable?  This is why so many traditional inerrantists, including J. W. Montgomery, J. P. Moreland, Randy Leedy, Thomas Schreiner, Douglas Bookman, and more have endorsed my work on the Gospels.  Here is some further friendly discussion (in two parts) of these concepts between me and traditional inerrantist Phil Fernandes:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLn75s6Wriw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8FKBaXrHqQ 

Originally uploaded to YouTube Jul 18 21