THE DAILY BLAST with Greg Sargent
Trump’s ICE Removals Take Darker Turn after Unnerving Rubio Admission
Mar 28, 2025
Guest Shev Dalal-Dheini, a top official with the American Immigration Lawyers Association, shines a light on alarming trends in ICE detentions targeting foreign students, particularly those with dissenting political views. She reveals how a recent case at Tufts highlights the chilling effect on civil liberties and free speech. The conversation dives into the implications of political admissions, the vague criteria for deportation, and the potential threat to lawful beliefs under current immigration policies. Dalal-Dheini urges listeners to reconsider the ramifications of these aggressive removals.
18:13
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The targeting of foreign students for deportation based on political beliefs poses a significant threat to First Amendment rights and due process.
- Secretary Rubio's admission reveals a troubling strategy by the administration to exploit vague legal standards to politically intimidate dissenting voices.
Deep dives
Targeting Political Speech
A troubling trend has emerged in which students are being detained and threatened with deportation based primarily on their political beliefs and expressions. The case of Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts student detained by ICE, exemplifies this issue, as she was accused of supporting Hamas solely for co-authoring an op-ed that criticized Israeli actions. This raises serious concerns regarding the First Amendment rights of both citizens and non-citizens, as the statement of mere opinion should not be grounds for such severe repercussions. The lack of substantial evidence supporting the claims against Ozturk highlights that these actions might be politically motivated rather than based on any genuine national security threats.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
