SCCM Podcast SCCMPod-551 CCM: Liberal vs Restrictive Blood Transfusion in TBI
Oct 3, 2025
In this discussion, Dr. Matheus Bannach, a neurosurgeon specializing in neurocritical care, shares insights from his systematic review on blood transfusion strategies for traumatic brain injury. He reveals that a liberal transfusion approach can improve neurologic outcomes compared to a restrictive one. Dr. Bannach delves into study methodologies, the limited supply of blood, and the risks involved in transfusions. He also highlights the importance of optimizing transfusion thresholds while addressing concerns over resource use and potential complications like ARDS.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Secondary Injury Drives Poor Neurologic Outcomes
- After TBI, surrounding brain tissue suffers secondary injury from impaired oxygen delivery that worsens cognition and behavior.
- Dr. Matheus Bannach emphasizes protecting peri-contusional areas to prevent memory loss, confusion, aggression, and seizures.
Use Software To Streamline Screening
- Use Rayyan or similar software to aggregate search results and remove duplicates when doing systematic reviews.
- This accelerates screening and reduces the risk of including duplicate populations across databases.
Labels Can Mislead Threshold Meaning
- 'Liberal' vs 'restrictive' labels refer to transfusion frequency, not absolute hemoglobin values, which causes confusion.
- A higher target hemoglobin equals a more liberal transfusion strategy because it requires more units.