Russian Diplomacy at the UN - Dmitry Polyanskiy, Alexander Mercouris & Glenn Diesen
Dec 31, 2023
auto_awesome
Russian diplomat Dmitry Polyanskiy, political commentator Alexander Mercouris, and geopolitical analyst Glenn Diesen discuss Russia's perspective on the conflict in Ukraine, including the West's involvement and NATO's encroachment. They delve into the importance of equal rights and cultural identity, highlight failed policies and negotiation attempts, and explore the United States' opposition at the UN.
The conflict in Ukraine is a result of tension between Russia and the West, with Ukraine being used as a tool to weaken Russia, and Russia's opposition to NATO's encroachment on its borders should not be ignored.
The United States' unwavering support for Israel hinders achieving a ceasefire in Gaza, with the US using its veto power in the Security Council to block resolutions, isolating themselves and facing better understanding from like-minded countries in the UN.
Deep dives
Russia's perspective on the conflict in Ukraine
According to Dimitri Polanski, Russia's first deputy permanent representative to the UN, the conflict in Ukraine is the result of years of tension between Russia and the West. He believes that the West, particularly the United States, has been keen on making Ukraine a tool to weaken Russia. Polanski highlights that Russia has been vocal about its opposition to NATO's encroachment on its borders since the early 2000s, and warns of the dangers of ignoring Russia's interests. He argues that Ukraine had a significant role to play in this crisis and mentions the Minsk agreements as a missed opportunity for peaceful resolution. Polanski emphasizes that Russia is not rejecting negotiations, but there are certain goals and redlines that need to be addressed, such as denazification and ensuring Ukrainian neutrality.
Obstacles to a ceasefire in Gaza
According to Dimitri Polanski, a major obstacle to achieving a ceasefire in Gaza is the United States' unwavering support for Israel. Polanski asserts that the US has used its veto power in the Security Council three times to prevent resolutions that would compromise Israeli plans on the ground. He criticizes the US for blocking a recent resolution that called for a humanitarian ceasefire. Polanski argues that the US's positioning hinders the work of the UN and makes it difficult to address the urgent need for a ceasefire in Gaza. He notes that the US's stance isolates them in the Security Council, with even close allies like the UK not fully supporting their position. Polanski highlights the support Russia receives from like-minded countries in the UN, indicating that many countries have a better understanding of the West's double standards.
Coordination within the BRICS countries at the UN
Dimitri Polanski emphasizes the high degree of coordination within the BRICS countries and other like-minded states at the UN, particularly on issues related to Gaza. He mentions that the support for Russia's positions in the Security Council has increased, with 10 council members immediately supporting an amendment on ceasefire. Polanski believes that many countries from the global south better understand Russia's reasoning behind the confrontation with the West, which has led to the West's isolation in the Security Council and General Assembly. He underscores that the West's blatant double standards in dealing with conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza have pushed more countries to align themselves with Russia's positions.
Challenges in reaching common views on international law
Dimitri Polanski points out that the biggest challenge in diplomacy lies in the West's disregard for legality and international law. He argues that international humanitarian law is being overlooked in both the Ukraine conflict and the situation in Gaza. Polanski criticizes the censorship and suppression of different opinions and facts that contradict the official narratives in the West, likening it to the worst times of the Soviet Union. He highlights the importance of platforms like the Security Council, where Russia can freely express its position without censorship or distortion. Polanski mentions the risks faced by those who challenge the public narrative and notes that many foreigners are seeking asylum in Russia because they feel safer and freer to express their opinions compared to the West.