Novelist Sheila Heti and critic Parul Sehgal discuss Heti's experimental book 'Alphabetical Diaries' where she alphabetizes sentences from her own diaries. They explore the balance between experiment and narrative, patterns in relationships, and the inclination towards formal experimentation in novels.
15:29
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
question_answer ANECDOTE
Alphabetical Diaries Creation
Sheila Heti's Alphabetical Diaries draws from 10 years of her personal diaries.
She alphabetized every sentence, creating chapters where each sentence starts with the same letter.
insights INSIGHT
Chronology Not Essential
Heti learned that chronology isn't essential for narrative flow.
She realized other factors, like the reader's mind and thematic connections, can drive a story forward.
insights INSIGHT
Recurring Relationship Patterns
Reviewing her diaries, Heti noticed recurring patterns in her relationships.
She realized she's drawn to similar personality types, making individuals feel like actors in set roles.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
The writer Sheila Heti is known for unusual approaches, but her latest work is decidedly experimental. Heti “is one of the most interesting novelists working today,” according to The New Yorker critic Parul Sehgal. “She is ruthlessly contemporary. By which I mean, she’s not interested in writing a novel as a nostalgic exercise. She’s constantly trying to figure out new places fiction can go. New ways that we’re using language, new ways that our minds are evolving.” To write her new book, “Alphabetical Diaries,” Heti combed through a decade’s worth of her own diaries, then alphabetized the sentences; in the first chapter, every sentence in the narrative begins with the letter “A,” and so on. “It’s fun to find writing that shouldn’t be in a novel, and to figure out, can it do the same things that we want writing in novels to do,” she shares, “which is [to] move us, and tell us something new about the world and about ourselves.” In other words, she’s not interested in experimentalism for its own sake. “I always want to write a straight realist novel,” she says. “Something proper, like the books that I love most. . . . It doesn’t happen, because I think I don’t notice the same things that those writers I love notice. I’m impatient with certain things that they were patient with.”