This podcast discusses the challenges of containing Medicaid costs at the state level. It explores the expansion of Medicaid, the need for reform, and methods to decrease spending. The incentivization of states to spend more on Medicaid is explored, along with potential reforms for reducing costs. The challenges of controlling Medicaid expenses, including reimbursement differentiation and long-term care challenges, are also addressed.
Changing Medicaid to a block grant program can incentivize states to crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse.
Exploring alternatives like telehealth and nurse practitioners can reduce Medicaid costs and make the program more efficient.
Deep dives
Medicaid as a Costly Program with Strange Incentives
Medicaid, a program designed to grow since its inception, has become one of the largest parts of the federal budget. It distorts state incentives to spend their own funds reasonably and shows a lack of concern for controlling overall spending. Strange incentives in the program have caused spending to escalate, starting from the beginning when New York State discovered there was no income limit to be considered 'low income.' With the Obamacare rollout, upfront spending increased, giving states an even larger incentive to expand eligibility. However, spending more on Medicaid does not necessarily lead to better health outcomes, as states with higher Medicaid spending do not have better results in areas like low birth weight.
Potential Solutions and Reform for Medicaid
One proposed solution is changing Medicaid to a block grant program, where each state receives a fixed amount of money to manage the entire program. This would incentivize states to crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse since they cannot rely on additional funds from the federal government. Congress needs to seriously consider this change in order to align Medicaid incentives better. States also have the opportunity to reduce Medicaid outlays by giving more flexibility to states, keeping a fixed amount of money, and potentially reducing it over time. However, changing Medicaid faces political difficulties, especially given the differing political climate and income disparities among states.
Efforts for Cost Control and Reformation in Medicaid
Some states have shown genuine interest in reducing Medicaid costs, understanding that they also have a financial responsibility. Idaho, for example, focused on the total amount spent on Medicaid and considered alternatives to rein in costs. However, turning over Medicaid program management to a managed care organization may not be an effective solution, as it does not align well with Medicaid's limited beneficiary copays. Other potentially promising approaches include telehealth and utilizing nurse practitioners, which can reduce costs compared to traditional doctor visits. Additionally, addressing long-term care costs for the elderly by preventing asset hiding and considering cost-effective alternatives like board and care facilities can make the Medicaid program more efficient.
Medicaid is consistently among the top two expenditure categories in every state budget, but Medicaid spending levels vary greatly among states. Marc Joffe discusses how to shrink the program.