Rebecca Burns, an investigative reporter specializing in housing and finance, joins the discussion about Robert Zemeckis’ animated classic. They delve into the film's nods to Los Angeles history, such as the Great Red Car Conspiracy, and explore how Toons represent marginalized communities. The conversation also touches on the groundbreaking animation techniques, the rivalry between Disney and Warner Bros, and the film’s darker themes reflective of capitalism and societal issues, including urban displacement and exploitation in Hollywood.
The podcast explores how 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit' reflects Los Angeles' history and marginalized communities through its animated characters.
Discussion highlights the film's groundbreaking technical achievements and the competitive tension between Disney and Warner Bros during its production.
Hosts and Rebecca Burns humorously appreciate Bob Hoskins' unique persona, describing him as a 'sexy little hairy meatball'.
Deep dives
Hillary Clinton's Controversial Remarks
Hillary Clinton's recent appearance on a late-night talk show sparked significant discussion regarding her comments on the dissatisfaction with 2024 presidential candidates. She bluntly told voters to 'get over themselves' when addressing concerns about the choice between Biden and Trump, which many perceived as condescending. This attitude highlights a prevailing issue within the Democratic party, where incumbents exhibit an air of entitlement and dismissiveness toward their constituents' preferences. Critics argue that such arrogance is not only unproductive but could alienate voters further, drawing stark comparisons to the failed Democratic strategies of 2016.
The Dilemma of Voting Choices
The podcast delves into the frustration many voters feel with the current two-party system, particularly in the face of a daunting electoral choice. Listeners are reminded that while Trump presents a significant risk to democracy, many struggle to reconcile voting for someone perceived to be complicit in systemic issues. This leads to broader reflections on the Democratic party's responsibility to present candidates that inspire genuine enthusiasm and reflect the will of the electorate. By failing to do this, the party risks further disengagement from a populace that feels their needs and desires are being overlooked.
Status Quo Reinforcement
Amidst the discussions about the potential candidates, a key observation is the Democratic party's reinforcement of the status quo, which leaves many disillusioned with the electoral process. The sentiment is that voters seeking change are often met with resistance and a lack of viable options, effectively trapping them in a cycle of dissatisfaction. This unwillingness to entertain alternatives contributes to feelings of disempowerment among the electorate, as the system adapts to maintain its existing hierarchies rather than foster inclusive democratic practices. The podcast poignantly underscores that this reality poses greater threats to democracy than the concerns people have about individual candidates.
Empathy and Fear in Electoral Politics
The podcast emphasizes the emotional toll and fear that the current political landscape imposes on voters, particularly with rising concerns about authoritarianism. It suggests that many individuals feel cornered by the binary choice presented by the two major parties, making honest conversations about alternatives more critical than ever. The conversation calls for a shift in narrative, from fear-based political engagement to one centered around empathy and shared understanding. This requires recognizing the diverse emotions of constituents and developing a rhetoric that validates their experiences and encourages genuine dialogue about their aspirations for change.
Challenging Rhetorical Conditioning
Listeners are encouraged to critically assess the rhetoric that often blames voters for election outcomes, particularly narratives that place the blame on third-party candidates or non-voters. The podcast argues that this perspective neglects the responsibility of candidates and parties to engage voters meaningfully and to address their needs. By reframing the narrative, voters can begin to recognize that agency in democratic processes lies not only in their choices but also in the willingness of parties to create genuine excitement and inclusivity around their platforms. This reshaping of dialogue aims to break the cycle of disillusionment, empowering constituents to hold leaders accountable for their campaign promises and electoral behaviors.
Rivka and Frank are joined by journalist Rebecca Burns for a conversation about Robert Zemeckis’ 1988 masterpiece Who Framed Roger Rabbit. They talk about how the film draws inspiration from Los Angeles’ history, like “The Great Red Car Conspiracy” and the Chavez Ravine. They also discuss how the film’s “Toons” serve as a stand-in for LA’s marginalized communities, the incredible technical achievements of the film, the tension between Disney and Warner Bros, and how Bob Hoskins is a sexy little hairy meatball.
MVC donates its ad space to progressive or leftist causes and organizations. If you’re interested in promoting your work, email us at moviesvscapitalism@gmail.com.