

Debate on the use of MRD for multiple myeloma management
Nov 16, 2017
Experts in multiple myeloma management discuss the use of MRD as primary endpoint for clinical trials, its potential as a treatment goal, and its applicability in clinical decision-making. The pros and cons of flow cytometry vs. next generation sequencing for MRD testing are explored, along with the importance of sensitivity and standardization. Available methods for managing multiple myeloma and the role of adherence in determining standardization are discussed. Efforts to standardize the use of flow in laboratories worldwide, improve reproducibility of data, and establish a quality control system are also highlighted.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5
Introduction
00:00 • 2min
The Impact of MRD Negativity on Multiple Myeloma Patients
01:44 • 3min
Comparing Advantages and Disadvantages of Flow versus Next-Generation Sequencing for MRD Testing
04:50 • 2min
Methods and Adherence in Managing Multiple Myeloma
06:58 • 5min
Standardizing the use of flow in laboratories and the role of M.R.D. in patient assessment
11:48 • 2min