Vivian Schiller, a former head of news at Twitter, joins Alison Holt, the BBC’s social affairs editor, and Tom Symonds, a BBC political correspondent, to discuss Meta's controversial decision to end independent fact-checking on its platforms. They debate the implications of replacing fact-checkers with community notes and the challenge of balancing free speech with misinformation. The conversation also delves into lessons learned from past inquiries into child sexual abuse, emphasizing the importance of urgent action and awareness to protect vulnerable individuals.
Meta's decision to replace independent fact-checkers with community notes raises concerns about misinformation reliability on social media platforms.
Mark Zuckerberg's emphasis on increased free speech and contentious discussions reflects a strategic shift in content moderation amid changing political dynamics.
Deep dives
Top Social Media Platforms
The episode begins with a quiz to identify the five largest social media platforms, highlighting that Facebook leads with over 3 billion active users, followed by YouTube, Instagram, WhatsApp, and TikTok. This engaging introduction sets the stage for a deeper discussion about the ongoing changes within Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The conversation pivots towards a significant announcement made by Mark Zuckerberg about shifting strategies regarding misinformation and free speech on these platforms. The mention of these platforms serves to underline their critical role in the social media landscape while foreshadowing the impact of Zuckerberg's new policies.
Zuckerberg's Policy Changes
Mark Zuckerberg's recent video details important shifts in how Meta platforms will handle misinformation, particularly the decision to move away from third-party fact-checkers to a community notes model. This move suggests that users will have more authority to correct misinformation themselves, reminiscent of practices on other platforms like X (formerly Twitter). Critics, including former Twitter executive Vivian Schiller, view this change as potentially politically motivated, given Zuckerberg's harsh criticism of existing fact-checkers for perceived bias. The implications of these changes are significant, as they raise concerns about the reliability of information on essential social networks and its impact on public discourse.
Free Speech and Content Moderation
An essential aspect of Zuckerberg's announcement involves allowing more 'free speech' on topics such as immigration and gender, reversing a previous trend of downranking potentially polarizing content. This shift aims to satisfy user demand for discussions on contentious issues, countering past algorithm adjustments intended to minimize divisiveness. The contrast with other social media leaders, like Elon Musk, highlights differing philosophies on content moderation, with Musk advocating for a 'happier' platform. The evolving stance of Meta may reflect broader societal changes regarding free expression, but it also raises questions about the ramifications for combating harmful content.
Impact of Political Climate on Social Media
The discussion touches upon the influence of the political landscape on Zuckerberg's policies, especially with Donald Trump's impending return to the presidency. The timing cannot be ignored, given the significant policy alterations announced just before Trump's inauguration, marking a stark contrast to previous bans imposed by Meta. This shift appears as a strategic maneuver to reshape Meta's image and business model while navigating complex international laws regarding censorship. Observations about these developments suggest a slippery slope in how terms like censorship and misinformation are defined and addressed, impacting both user experience and the broader socio-political environment.
Today, we look at why Meta is bringing to an end the use of independent fact-checkers on Facebook and Instagram - and replacing them with ‘community notes’.
In a video posted online Mark Zuckerberg said third-party moderators were "too politically biased" and it was "time to get back to our roots around free expression". Adam is joined by Vivian Schiller, vice president and executive director of Aspen Digital, and former head of news at Twitter.
And, as Sir Keir Starmer is under pressure to launch a UK-wide investigation into grooming gangs, Adam speaks to Tom Symonds, the BBC’s political correspondent, and Alison Holt, the BBC’s social affairs editor, about what was learnt from past inquiries into child sexual abuse.
You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast”. It works on most smart speakers.
You can join our Newscast online community here: https://tinyurl.com/newscastcommunityhere
Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Adam Fleming. It was made by Jack Maclaren with Anna Harris and Teodora Agarici. The technical producer was Ricardo McCarthy. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The editor is Sam Bonham.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode