We explore the complex moral landscape of abortion through the perspectives of two philosophical giants, John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant, as simulated by AI.

Mill defends abortion from a utilitarian standpoint, emphasizing individual autonomy and the consequences of our actions, while Kant objects to abortion from a deontological approach, focusing on inherent human dignity and universal moral laws.

Join us as we delve into intense discussions on autonomy, moral duties, and the ethical implications of difficult choices, including thought experiments involving moral blackmail and the value of life at different stages.

[00:00] Introduction and Special Guest Announcement

[00:28] John Stuart Mill's Thought Experiment

[02:13] Utilitarian Perspective on Sarah's Dilemma

[05:57] Infanticide and Utilitarianism

[07:21] Harm Principle and Moral Community

[12:01] Free Speech and Moral Boundaries

[18:35] Immanuel Kant's Perspective

[19:36] Kant vs. Mill on Abortion

[24:03] Moral Dilemmas and Ethical Principles

[35:16] Utilitarianism vs. Deontological Ethics

[42:32] Conclusion

Abortion: An AI Debate - Mill vs Kant