Behind the News: Israel's Illegal Occupations w/ Heidi Matthews
Aug 7, 2024
auto_awesome
Heidi Matthews, an analyst on international law, dives deep into the World Court's declaration that Israel's occupation is illegal. The discussion spans the implications for global geopolitics and accountability. Also featured is Nausicaa Renner, an author providing a psychological analysis of President Biden, examining how personal history influences his political decisions, especially regarding Israel and Gaza. They explore Biden's mixed support and the shifting dynamics of crypto's influence in politics, revealing exciting intersections of law, psychology, and finance.
The International Court of Justice's ruling declared Israel's occupation illegal, mandating states to refrain from supporting its violations of international law.
The political ramifications of the ruling could influence global arms trades and trigger domestic litigations against nations that support Israel's occupation.
Deep dives
International Court of Justice Ruling on Israel's Occupation
The International Court of Justice issued a landmark ruling deeming Israel's military occupation of the Palestinian territories, including Gaza, East Jerusalem, and the West Bank, as unlawful. The ruling highlighted a range of serious infractions related to Israel's policies, marking a significant legal finding as it is the first instance where the court has declared the totality of the occupation itself illegal. This ruling broadens the earlier findings concerning Israel's settlement policies, indicating that the unlawful nature of the occupation encompasses systemic violations over the last nearly 57 years, aiming to protect the rights of the Palestinian people. The decision serves as an advisory opinion meant to guide United Nations bodies in understanding applicable international law, even though Israel has historically refused to recognize the court's jurisdiction.
Legal and Political Implications of the Ruling
The court clarified that Israel is obligated to cease its illegal occupation as quickly as possible, highlighting the responsibilities of other states, particularly those aiding Israel politically and materially. By categorizing the occupation as illegal, UN member states are now obliged to not support Israel’s unlawful actions and must take steps to end the violations of international law. The ruling has potential implications for various sectors, particularly concerning arms trades and foreign policy, pressuring states giving material support to reconsider their relationships with Israel. It signifies a notable shift in international legal obligations, where compliance and accountability are now focal points of discussion in relation to Israel's ongoing presence in the occupied territories.
The Political Landscape and Reactions
Responses to the ruling have varied across different nations, with some states, like Ireland and Iceland, openly supporting the decision while others, including the United States and Canada, have been slow and circumscribed in their reactions. The U.S. political landscape remains uncertain, especially with respect to how current presidential candidates will respond to the implications of the ruling in an election season where engagement with issues of foreign policy will be crucial. Observers point to a need for a reevaluation of arms sales and financial support given to Israel, especially under a potential new administration in the U.S. Transitioning political dynamics within critical jurisdictions could drastically affect the implementation of the court's ruling on a global scale.
Domestic and International Legal Repercussions
The repercussions of the International Court of Justice's ruling may lead to intensified domestic litigation against states seen as supporting Israel's occupation. There is a growing anticipation for domestic actions across the globe, particularly in countries like Canada, the UK, and Germany, targeting arms exports and investment decisions that may support the occupation. Furthermore, other international cases against Israel are unfolding that could impact this legal landscape, including ongoing actions by South Africa regarding alleged genocide. The ruling not only sheds light on Israel's actions but also raises questions regarding the enforcement of international laws, potentially leading to increased public scrutiny and demands for accountability regarding governmental support of Israel's policies.
Heidi Matthews analyzes the World Court’s declaration of Israel’s occupations illegal. Molly White looks at how crypto is spending its money in politics. And lastly, Nausicaa Renner, author of a recent article for Parapraxis, psychoanalyzes Joe Biden.
Behind the News, hosted by Doug Henwood, covers the worlds of economics and politics and their complex interactions, from the local to the global. Find the archive online: https://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/radio.html
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode