The NPR Politics Podcast Absolute Immunity? Presidents Don't Have It.
Jul 9, 2020
The Supreme Court's recent ruling on presidential immunity sends shockwaves through political circles, clarifying that no president is above the law. The discussion dives into the legal implications regarding subpoenas for financial records and the broader context of accountability. Political reactions from figures like Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi highlight the contentious atmosphere surrounding tax transparency. Additionally, the podcast reflects on Trump’s judicial appointments and their appeal to conservative voters, setting the stage for ongoing legal and political battles.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Presidential Immunity Rejected
- The Supreme Court ruled that a New York prosecutor can subpoena President Trump's financial records.
- This rejects Trump's claim of "categorical immunity" from investigation while in office.
Congressional Subpoena Power Limited
- The Supreme Court limited Congress's power to subpoena the President's financial records.
- This sets a higher bar for Congress to access such information.
Trump's Reaction
- President Trump expressed his frustration with the Supreme Court ruling on Twitter.
- He claimed that he's treated differently from other presidents.