In this engaging conversation, Jonathan Birch, a Philosophy professor at the London School of Economics and author of 'The Edge of Sentience,' dives into the complexities of sentience across various beings, from humans with consciousness disorders to AI. He discusses the dangers of overconfidence in assessing sentience, emphasizing historical medical practices that overlooked suffering. Birch also explores ethical implications in policy-making and the evolving understanding of sentience in species like invertebrates and neural organoids, urging a careful, evidence-based approach.
02:01:50
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
menu_book Books
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
question_answer ANECDOTE
Kate Bainbridge's Experience
Kate Bainbridge was treated as if she felt nothing while in a vegetative state.
After recovering, she testified to her harrowing experience of pain and lack of information.
question_answer ANECDOTE
fMRI Evidence of Covert Consciousness
Adrian Owen's team used fMRI scanners on vegetative patients, asking them yes/no questions.
The Edge of Sentience: Risk and Precaution in Humans, Other Animals, and AI
Jonathan Birch
"In the 1980s, it was still apparently common to perform surgery on newborn babies without anaesthetic on both sides of the Atlantic. This led to appalling cases, and to public outcry, and to campaigns to change clinical practice. And as soon as [some courageous scientists] looked for evidence, it showed that this practice was completely indefensible and then the clinical practice was changed. People don’t need convincing anymore that we should take newborn human babies seriously as sentience candidates. But the tale is a useful cautionary tale, because it shows you how deep that overconfidence can run and how problematic it can be. It just underlines this point that overconfidence about sentience is everywhere and is dangerous." —Jonathan Birch
Candidates for sentience, such as humans with consciousness disorders, foetuses, neural organoids, invertebrates, and AIs
Humanity’s history of acting as if we’re sure that such beings are incapable of having subjective experiences — and why Jonathan thinks that that certainty is completely unjustified.
Chilling tales about overconfident policies that probably caused significant suffering for decades.
How policymakers can act ethically given real uncertainty.
Whether simulating the brain of the roundworm C. elegans or Drosophila (aka fruit flies) would create minds equally sentient to the biological versions.
How new technologies like brain organoids could replace animal testing, and how big the risk is that they could be sentient too.
Why Jonathan is so excited about citizens’ assemblies.
Jonathan’s conversation with the Dalai Lama about whether insects are sentient.
And plenty more.
Chapters:
Cold open (00:00:00)
Luisa’s intro (00:01:20)
The interview begins (00:03:04)
Why does sentience matter? (00:03:31)
Inescapable uncertainty about other minds (00:05:43)
The “zone of reasonable disagreement” in sentience research (00:10:31)
Disorders of consciousness: comas and minimally conscious states (00:17:06)
Foetuses and the cautionary tale of newborn pain (00:43:23)
Neural organoids (00:55:49)
AI sentience and whole brain emulation (01:06:17)
Policymaking at the edge of sentience (01:28:09)
Citizens’ assemblies (01:31:13)
The UK’s Sentience Act (01:39:45)
Ways Jonathan has changed his mind (01:47:26)
Careers (01:54:54)
Discussing animal sentience with the Dalai Lama (01:59:08)
Luisa’s outro (02:01:04)
Producer and editor: Keiran Harris Audio engineering by Ben Cordell, Milo McGuire, Simon Monsour, and Dominic Armstrong Additional content editing: Katy Moore and Luisa Rodriguez Transcriptions: Katy Moore
80,000 Hours Podcast 
