

Why did Trump strike Iran?
Jun 23, 2025
Jacob Heilbrunn, Editor of the National Interest and an expert on American foreign policy, joins to dissect Trump's recent military strikes on Iran. They explore Trump's motives, highlighting his desire for a bold legacy yet grappling with a paradox between his ‘America First’ rhetoric and military actions. The discussion extends to Iran's potential responses and geopolitical tensions involving Russia and Israel. Heilbrunn also sheds light on the complex implications of religious rhetoric in shaping U.S. foreign policy and the fracturing views within Trump's political base.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Trump's Bold Strike Contradicts His America First Stance
- Trump's strike on Iran aligns with his desire to be seen as bold and decisive in history.
- His actions contradict his previous America First, anti-intervention stance, risking alienation of his base.
Strikes and Regime Change Signals
- Trump’s strikes may have been partly performative but likely caused serious damage.
- His public call for regime change in Iran signals a tougher stance than previous administrations.
Diplomacy Unlikely Amid Shifting Global Influence
- Trump's hope is Iran will strike a diplomatic deal after the strikes but the regime is unlikely to surrender quietly.
- Russia’s influence in Iran is waning, while China’s role may be more significant in current negotiations.