

Judicial Philosophy | Interview: Sarah Isgur, Justice Amy Coney Barrett
17 snips Sep 9, 2025
Amy Coney Barrett, an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, discusses her originalist philosophy and the complexities of legal interpretation. She shares insights on the impact of civic education and the evolving role of the judiciary amidst political polarization. The conversation dives into the art of judicial writing, including the significance of concurrences and dissents. Barrett also reflects on her experiences as a clerk for Justice Antonin Scalia and the nuances of navigating oral arguments and emergency dockets in today's legal landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Family In The Room
- Sarah Isgur described interviewing Justice Barrett at the Court with her husband and oldest daughter present, which made the taping more personal.
- Barrett was careful about topics but relaxed when recounting family moments, giving glimpses of her off‑bench self.
Academic Lens Shapes Jurisprudence
- Barrett's academic background shapes a different take on originalism than colleagues with executive or legislative experience.
- Her long academic career makes her explanations of methodology and process unusually detailed.
Prioritize Practical Statutory Training
- Teach statute and regulation interpretation thoroughly because most legal practice depends on them.
- Include originalism in constitutional curricula so students understand prevalent judicial arguments.