Join Keith Anderson, CEO of Scottish Power, and Dieter Helm, Professor of Energy Policy at Oxford, as they tackle the pressing issues surrounding COP26. They discuss whether this summit can truly turn the tide on climate change, facing skepticism on its potential impact and the rising carbon emissions despite past agreements. The conversation pushes for a bottom-up approach, highlighting the importance of individual consumption and corporate responsibility. With China and major emitters in focus, the duo explores how innovative solutions and collective action are vital for genuine progress.
47:11
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
menu_book Books
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
COP26 Impact
Thirty years of climate summits haven't slowed rising atmospheric CO2 levels.
Real change requires focusing on consumption, not just emissions.
volunteer_activism ADVICE
Addressing Emerging Markets
Recognize that Western net-zero plans might hinder developing nations' growth.
Facilitate development through financial aid and technology transfer, not just demands.
insights INSIGHT
Shifting Public Opinion
Public and business engagement in climate action has increased significantly.
This shift influences investment decisions and pushes companies towards greener practices.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
In 'Net Zero', Dieter Helm presents a balanced view on how to stop causing climate change by adopting a net zero strategy. He argues that past efforts have failed and outlines a plan for success over the next 30 years. The book emphasizes the need for a carbon price and highlights the importance of reducing carbon consumption at all levels.
This debate, recorded on Thursday 28th October 2021, was part of Energised, a debate series from Intelligence Squared in partnership with Iberdrola, a leading company in the field of renewable energy. It’s make or break time for the planet. That’s the warning issued by the UN ahead of COP26 in Glasgow this November, when leaders and heads of state from all over the world will meet to agree on global action to fight climate change. The main goal will be for them to commit to reaching net-zero carbon emissions by the middle of the century with interim targets by 2030. If they don’t achieve this, many scientists warn, the effects of rising global temperatures – extreme weather, rising sea levels and warming oceans – may become irreversible. But what are the chances of success? Very little, if previous summits are anything to go by. Despite a COP having taken place every year since 1995 (with the exception of last year due to the pandemic), and all the buzz around the Kyoto Protocol of 2011 and the Paris Agreement of 2015, concentrations of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere have continued to rise steadily, even during the lockdowns of 2020. But this year there is an unprecedented urgency in the run up to the conference. Can the biggest emitters – China, the US, India, Russia and Japan – be persuaded to sign up to legally binding agreements on emissions? Will the voices of people from the Global South, where the effects of the climate crisis are already being felt, be heard? And is the UN’s top-down approach really the best way to tackle the most pressing existential threat facing the world today? We were joined by ScottishPower CEO Keith Anderson and Professor of Energy Policy and Official Fellow in Economics Dieter Helm to debate whether COP26 will make any serious contribution in the fight against climate change. The debate was chaired by Kamal Ahmed.
Intelligence Squared 