“The Problem with Defining an ‘AGI Ban’ by Outcome (a lawyer’s take).” by Katalina Hernandez

Katalina Hernandez, a practicing lawyer and expert in AGI policy, dives deep into the complexities of regulating artificial general intelligence. She explains why defining AGI based on potential outcomes, like human extinction, is legally inadequate. Instead, she argues for precise, enforceable definitions that focus on precursor capabilities such as autonomy and deception. Citing lessons from nuclear treaties, Katalina emphasizes the importance of establishing bright lines to enable effective regulation and prevent disastrous risks.