Alphonse Bertillon, the developer of a system of identification via body measurements for identifying crime suspects with an existing criminal history, is explored in this podcast. The most intriguing topics include his positive achievements, problematic issues, his background and childhood, early life fascination with the human skeleton, organizing criminal records, his involvement in high-profile criminal cases, and the downfall of the Bertillon System due to his arrogance and refusal to accept criticism.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Alphonse Bertillon developed a system of identification based on body measurements, which successfully identified repeat offenders in French police records.
Despite initial success, the Bertillon system faced flaws and criticisms, including the need for specialized instruments and changes in a person's body over time.
Deep dives
Alphonse Bertillon's System of Identification
Alphonse Bertillon developed a system of identification based on body measurements, designed to identify repeat offenders in the French police records. His method involved taking precise measurements of various body parts, such as the head, forearm, and finger length, and recording other physical characteristics like scars and eye color. These measurements were then organized into a system of cards, allowing police officers to easily search for matches. Despite initial skepticism, Bertillon achieved significant success, identifying numerous repeat offenders and gaining recognition for his innovative approach.
The Flaws and Criticisms of the Bertillon System
While Bertillon's system of identification initially had success, it faced several flaws and criticisms. The system required specialized instruments and training, making it cumbersome to implement in police departments. Additionally, changes in a person's body over time, such as aging, made it difficult to match them with previous records. Instances of mistaken identification also challenged Bertillon's claim that no two people would have the same measurements. Ultimately, the rise of fingerprinting and other identification methods led to a decline in the use of the Bertillon system.
Alphonse Bertillon's Involvement in the Dreyfus Affair
Bertillon's arrogance and biased analysis had serious consequences during his involvement in the infamous Dreyfus Affair. As an alleged handwriting expert in the trial of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, he wrongly attributed a forged document to Dreyfus, a Jewish officer. This resulted in Dreyfus's wrongful conviction and sparked a wave of anti-Semitism in France. Despite later evidence proving Dreyfus's innocence, Bertillon vehemently defended his claims, causing division within his own family and tarnishing his reputation as an expert.
The Legacy of Alphonse Bertillon and the Decline of his System
Though Alphonse Bertillon made significant contributions to criminology, his system of identification ultimately faced criticism and was largely abandoned. However, the use of standardized mugshots, featuring front and profile photographs, continues to be used today. Bertillon's stubborn nature and refusal to acknowledge flaws in his system hindered its potential, but his pioneering work paved the way for advancements in criminal identification and forensic science.
Bertillon developed a system of identification via body measurements that was designed to identify whether crime suspects had an existing criminal history. But his contributions to police work have been occluded by some terrible missteps.
Research:
Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Alphonse Bertillon". Encyclopedia Britannica, 19 Apr. 2023, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alphonse-Bertillon
“Identifying Prisoners.” St. Louis Globe-Democrat. December 16, 1886. https://www.newspapers.com/image/571277110/?terms=Alphonse%20Bertillion&match=1
Gates, Kelly. “Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance.” NYU Press. 2011.
Fornabai, Nanette L. “Criminal Factors: ‘Fantômas’, Anthropometrics, and the Numerical Fictions of Modern Criminal Identity.” Yale French Studies, no. 108, 2005, pp. 60–73. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/4149298
Fosdick, Raymond B. “The Passing of the Bertillon System of Identification.” Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 6, no. 3, 1915, pp. 363–69. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1132744
Hoobler, Thomas and Dorothy. “The Crimes of Paris: A True Story of Murder, Theft, and Detection.” Little, Brown, and Co. 2009.
Levendowski, Amanda, “Face Surveillance Was Always Flawed.” Public Books. Nov. 30, 2021. https://www.publicbooks.org/face-surveillance-was-always-flawed/
Mouat, F. J. “Notes on M. Bertillon’s Discourse on the Anthropometric Measurement of Criminals.” The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 20, 1891, pp. 182–98. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2842237
Wang, Hansi Lo. “Meet Alphonse Bertillon, The Man Behind The Modern Mug Shot.” NPR. March 8, 2016. https://www.npr.org/2016/03/08/469174753/meet-alphonse-bertillon-the-man-behind-the-modern-mug-shot
Daniel V. The Social History of Disaster Victim Identification in the United States, 1865 to 1950. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2020 Mar;10(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/1925362120941336
Helfand, Jessica. “Alphonse Bertillon and the Troubling Pursuit of Human Metrics.” The MIT Press Reader. May 5. 2021. https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-troubling-pursuit-of-human-metrics/
“Alphonse Bertillon (1853-1914).” National Library of Medicine. Visible Proofs: Forensic Views of the Body. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/visibleproofs/galleries/biographies/bertillon.html
Farebrother, R. and Champkin, J. (2014), Alphonse Bertillon and the measure of man: More expert than Sherlock Holmes. Significance, 11: 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2014.00739.x
Guthrie, Glenice J., and Sharon Jenkins. “Bertillon Files: An Untapped Source of Nineteenth-Century Human Height Data.” Journal of Anthropological Research, vol. 61, no. 2, 2005, pp. 201–15. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3630855