'If You Can Keep It': Trump's Early Moves And The Constitution
Jan 27, 2025
auto_awesome
Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, and Martha Jones, a history professor at Johns Hopkins, delve into the tumultuous start of Trump's second term. They discuss the controversial removal of federal inspectors general, highlighting the importance of accountability. The conversation shifts to the legal challenges against Trump's birthright citizenship executive order and its implications on the 14th Amendment, emphasizing the historical context of citizenship and its vital role in democracy.
The dismissal of inspectors general raises alarms about accountability and adherence to legal protocols within the federal government.
Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship challenges historical legal precedents and ignites debate over immigration and constitutional rights.
Deep dives
The Impact of Inspectors General Purge
The recent dismissal of approximately 17 inspectors general from their positions raises significant concerns about government oversight and accountability. These inspectors, crucial for investigating waste, fraud, and misconduct, ensure that federal agencies function effectively and transparently. The legal requirement for a 30-day notification to Congress before such dismissals was ignored, suggesting an alarming disregard for established protocols. This purge reflects a broader pattern of removing individuals who might challenge or criticize the administration, undermining the independence necessary for inspectors general to perform their roles.
Legal and Constitutional Challenges Ahead
The efforts to terminate inspectors general have led to questions about legal remedies and the potential for congressional action. While some inspectors general may seek to challenge their dismissals legally, Congress holds significant power in addressing these infractions through oversight and enforcement of laws. There is a fear that if such dismissals go unchallenged, it could establish a precedent that undermines the checks and balances intended by the Constitution. Additionally, the ongoing legal battles regarding Trump's executive orders, such as those impacting birthright citizenship, further complicate expectations around governmental authority and individual rights.
Repercussions of Birthright Citizenship Challenges
President Trump's recent executive order regarding birthright citizenship is sparking debate over the historical and constitutional implications of such a move. The order seeks to redefine citizenship for children born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrants, challenging a longstanding legal precedent established by previous Supreme Court rulings. This shift could potentially impact the rights of countless individuals and create uncertainty for families across the nation. The struggle over the 14th Amendment reflects deeper societal tensions regarding immigration and identity, as opponents of the order argue that it undermines the democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution.
The first week of President Trump's new term ended with a late-night purge of around 17 federal inspectors general on Friday.
The exact total is still unclear. Trump said the move was a, quote, "very standard thing to do." But federal law requires a 30-day notification to Congress before inspectors general can be removed from their posts.
Also, in the first week of his second term – four Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit to stop President Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. On Thursday a federal judge in Seattle temporarily halted the implementation of the order, calling it, quote, "blatantly unconstitutional."
Our series, "If You Can Keep It," cuts through political noise to consider the state of our Democratic Republic and what matters to you.
We discuss the IG purge, take a closer look at the legal challenges to Trump's early moves, and how the Constitution guides our understanding of executive power today.