Jacob Buchdahl, a partner at Susman Godfrey, recently clinched a landmark $1.6 billion judgment against China Construction America for BML Properties over the failed Baha Mar Resort project. He delves into the fraud and contract breaches that plagued the project, detailing how CCA misled BML about construction timelines. Jacob discusses his strategic focus on the fraudulent acts revealed in internal documents, which ultimately led to a devastating bankruptcy for BML. The conversation highlights the complexities of international construction law and the challenges of legal adaptation.
31:38
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
question_answer ANECDOTE
Baha Mar Project
BML Properties, led by Sarkis Izmirlian, envisioned Baha Mar as a competitor to Atlantis.
The 2007 financial crisis forced them to partner with China Construction America (CCA) due to funding from a Chinese policy bank.
insights INSIGHT
China's Belt and Road
The lender's requirement for a Chinese construction company stemmed from China's Belt and Road initiative.
This initiative aimed to expand Chinese construction companies' global presence, including the Bahamas.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Fraud and Breach of Contract
CCA, acting as both contractor and investor, made promises about a March 2015 opening, leading BML to incur expenses.
Internal documents revealed CCA knew they couldn't meet the deadline and intentionally delayed to maintain leverage, leading to BML's bankruptcy.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
John is joined by Jacob Buchdahl, partner at Susman Godfrey. They discuss the landmark $1.6 billion judgment Jacob recently won in New York state court on behalf of BML Properties against China Construction America, Inc. (CCA). The case concerned allegations of fraud and breach of contract over the failed development of the Baha Mar Resort, a luxury property in the Bahamas. Jacob explains that BML Properties envisioned the Baha Mar Resort as a competitor to the Atlantis resort in the Bahamas. Following the 2007 financial crisis, BML secured funding from a Chinese policy bank, which required hiring CCA as the contractor as part of China’s Belt and Road initiative. CCA, a subsidiary of the state-owned China State Construction Engineering Corporation, also became an investor in the project. The relationship soured as construction delays mounted, culminating in late 2014 when CCA promised that the resort would open in March 2015. Relying on these assurances, BML incurred significant expenses to prepare for the opening. However, internal CCA documents obtained during discovery showed that CCA knew it could not meet the deadline and withheld this information. Worse, the documents suggested CCA intentionally delayed completion to maintain leverage over BML, leading to a liquidity crisis, bankruptcy, and the loss of BML’s $800 million investment. Jacob explains his legal strategy, including narrowing the case to focus on fraudulent acts at the critical late stages of the project and contractual breaches that were clearly distinguishable from the fraud allegations. He explains that the trial featured crucial evidence from internal communications and expert testimony on damages and financial mismanagement. He also explains that the judgment is nearly twice BML’s damages because of New York’s high pre-trial interest rates. Despite CCA’s appeal and potential bankruptcy, Jacob remains optimistic about enforcing the judgment and securing justice for his client.
Law, disrupted