In this insightful discussion, Rachel Louise Snyder, a journalist and author of 'No Visible Bruises', dives into the grim realities faced by women incarcerated for homicide—20% of whom killed their abusive partners. She unpacks the failures of self-defense laws and the urgent need for reform that acknowledges the complexities of domestic violence. By sharing poignant stories, including Anita Ford's, Snyder emphasizes the emotional turmoil of victims and the systemic changes necessary to protect women in abusive situations.
Research reveals that 20% of women incarcerated for homicide killed their abusers, highlighting flaws in self-defense laws.
The case of Anita Ford exemplifies the need for legal reform in self-defense to consider prolonged domestic abuse circumstances.
Deep dives
The Intersection of Domestic Violence and Homicide
Research indicates a significant connection between domestic violence and women's homicide convictions. About 20% of surveyed women who were incarcerated for homicide reported killing their abusive partners, while a majority of the surveyed women experienced abuse regardless of whom they killed. These cases highlight the coercive power dynamics in abusive relationships, where women may be forced to commit crimes under life-threatening circumstances orchestrated by their abuser. The findings suggest that conventional narratives about women's motives in violent crimes are often oversimplified and influenced by societal biases.
The Case of Anita Ford: Challenging Self-Defense Laws
Anita Ford's story exemplifies the inadequacies in current self-defense laws surrounding domestic violence. Initially, Ford experienced escalating abuse from her husband, which culminated in circumstances that led to his death. Although she did not directly kill him, Ford was implicated as a key figure in his murder committed by her brother, raising questions about her culpability and the legal system's understanding of self-defense in domestic settings. This case sheds light on how legal definitions of self-defense often fail to consider the prolonged context of abuse that victims endure.
Reforming Legal Frameworks for Domestic Violence
The podcast discusses the need for reform in self-defense laws to account for the unique circumstances faced by women in abusive relationships. Current laws primarily cater to scenarios involving immediate threats, but they do not adequately reflect the realities of domestic violence where danger is often ongoing rather than instantaneous. Comparisons are made with Canada, where recent reforms aim to broaden the definitions surrounding self-defense and the use of evidence in court. These changes could potentially shield women like Anita Ford from harsh legal consequences that do not accurately portray their experiences and struggles.
A survey of people incarcerated in California found that 20 percent of women in for homicide had killed their abusive partners. How have self-defense laws failed women in abusive relationships—and how can they be reformed to save lives?
Want more What Next? Join Slate Plus to unlock full, ad-free access to What Next and all your other favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the What Next show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.