

Popper
Feb 8, 2007
In this engaging discussion, experts Anthony O'Hear, Nancy Cartwright, and John Worrall delve into the revolutionary ideas of Karl Popper, a pivotal figure in 20th-century philosophy. They explore Popper's bold critiques of empiricism, emphasizing his theory of falsification that distinguishes genuine science from pseudoscience. The guests highlight his impact on both science and politics, from his defense of an 'open society' to influencing movements in Eastern Europe. Listeners will gain insights into how Popper's philosophies continue to resonate in contemporary debates.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Einstein Tested What Others Sheltered
- Popper contrasted Einstein's risky tests with Marxism and psychoanalysis which avoided genuine refutation.
- He used Einstein's eclipse test and Newton's replacement to show science advances by bold conjectures facing severe tests.
Falsifiability As The Science Marker
- Popper argued scientific theories are distinguished by being falsifiable, not by being provable from observations.
- A theory's willingness to risk refutation marks it as scientific rather than pseudo-scientific.
Rejecting Induction, Embracing Conjecture
- Popper accepted Hume's problem of induction and rejected a universal justification for inductive inference.
- He claimed science proceeds by bold conjecture and rigorous attempts at refutation rather than inductive proof.