Join Dr. Samuel Gregg, the Friedrich Hayek Chair in Economics and a political economy expert from Oxford, as he unpacks the complexities of industrial policy. He challenges misconceptions about taxation and the so-called 'China shock,' arguing that job losses are often overstated. Gregg emphasizes the importance of deregulation for the semiconductor industry and critiques the failures of industrial policies in various regions. He also stresses the critical role of price theory in economic education and its impact on inflation and taxation.
A clear definition of industrial policy is crucial to understanding its implications and effectiveness in influencing economic sectors.
The 'China shock' illustrates that job losses are part of a broader economic adaptation process rather than solely attributed to increased trade with China.
Deep dives
Defining Industrial Policy
Industrial policy is characterized by government interventions designed to influence specific economic sectors through means such as subsidies, tax incentives, and grants to businesses. The discussion surrounding industrial policy often suffers from varying definitions, leading to misunderstandings about its implications and effectiveness. A clear definition allows for a more substantial debate on its merits, particularly concerning whether such policies lead to desirable economic outcomes or ultimately fail. Advocates sometimes conflate defense spending with industrial policy, arguing that national security needs justify such government involvement, but this perspective overlooks the essential functions of government, which are distinct from market-driven activities.
Examining the Semiconductor Industry
The U.S. already leads in advanced semiconductor production, casting doubt on claims that relocating production from regions like Taiwan is a national security necessity. Production of legacy semiconductors is not solely a military priority, and the advanced semiconductor sectors in the U.S. have flourished without the need for extensive industrial policies, relying instead on a competitive market environment. Efforts to attract semiconductor firms through policies like the CHIPS Act reveal the politicization of industrial policy, where companies face regulatory strings that may inhibit efficiency. Historical evidence suggests that the semiconductor industry's growth in states like Arizona stemmed from deregulation rather than from government-directed industrial policy.
Critiquing Global Industrial Policies
Proponents of industrial policy often cite the success of countries like South Korea and Japan; however, this view can be misleading. Japan's experience demonstrates that excessive reliance on industrial policies can lead to stagnation rather than growth, with many sectors failing to thrive under heavy governmental intervention. In other countries, there is a pattern where economic growth follows the reduction of industrial policies and an increase in trade. A true assessment of these cases shows that those countries that thrived did so by moving away from centralized industrial policymaking, which often leads to misallocation of resources and entrenched inefficiencies.
Understanding the China Shock
The term 'China shock' refers to the economic disruptions caused by increased trade with China, which has often been oversimplified in public discourse to suggest catastrophic job losses. Rigorous research indicates that the much-quoted figure of 2 million lost manufacturing jobs is exaggerated; a closer look reveals that the actual impact was less severe, with many jobs lost across various sectors rather than just manufacturing. Moreover, any job losses attributed to Chinese imports only account for a fraction of the total job turnover happening annually in the U.S. The essential takeaway from China shock research is less about protecting the market and more about understanding how workers adapt to economic changes, a perspective often overlooked in favor of protectionist arguments.
What is industrial policy, and does it work? What really is the “China shock”? Do the rich pay their fair share?
Dr. Samuel Gregg sits down with host Dominic Pino to discuss these questions.
Samuel Gregg is the Friedrich Hayek Chair in Economics and Economic History at the American Institute for Economic Research. He has a Doctorate in moral philosophy and political economy from Oxford University, and an M.A. in political philosophy from the University of Melbourne.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
