BIBLICAL INERRANCY: What Does “Without Error” Really Mean? Interview with Dr. Richard Howe
Jan 2, 2025
auto_awesome
In this engaging discussion, Dr. Richard Howe, the Norman L. Geisler Chair of Christian Apologetics, explores the profound topic of biblical inerrancy. He delves into the complexities of reconciling biblical accounts and advocates for interpreting scripture contextually. Howe elaborates on the correspondence theory of truth, emphasizing how it shapes faith. He also examines literary devices in the Bible and the importance of cultural context. Listeners gain meaningful insights into navigating apparent contradictions and deepening their understanding of Scripture's authority.
Dr. Richard Howe emphasizes that the doctrine of inerrancy asserts the Bible's divine messages are free from error despite varied interpretations within Christianity.
Contextual analysis is crucial for understanding biblical scripture as differing accounts highlight theological aims over strict historical accuracy.
Philosophical foundations shape our understanding of inerrancy, with Howe arguing that clarifying truth and error impacts believers' views on scripture's reliability.
Deep dives
The Doctrine of Inerrancy Explained
The doctrine of inerrancy asserts that the Bible, as the inspired Word of God, is without error in its teachings and claims. A working definition involves understanding that what Scripture states is true, as it conveys divine messages through human authors. Richard Howe emphasizes that while many Christians believe in inerrancy, defining it uniformly remains a challenge, highlighting an ironic struggle within the faith community. This conversation engages various perspectives on inerrancy, its implications, and how to approach apparent contradictions within the biblical text.
The Importance of Understanding Context
Contextual analysis plays a crucial role in interpreting biblical scripture, especially when confronting perceived contradictions. The complexity of language and historical context means that declarative statements might not always adhere to modern standards of accuracy. For instance, differing accounts of events, like the timing of Jesus's crucifixion, illustrate how each Gospel writer had specific theological aims. Therefore, interpreting these texts requires not only attention to literary form and authorial intent but also a recognition of the cultural and historical frameworks that shaped their writing.
The Role of Philosophy in Inerrancy
Philosophical foundations significantly influence the understanding and discussion of the doctrine of inerrancy. Howe underscores the necessity of clarifying what truth and error mean in the context of biblical assertions, which also necessitates a cohesive theory of truth. He contrasts correspondence theory, which posits that truth corresponds directly to reality, with alternative theories that may allow for errors based on the author's intent. This philosophical underpinning is not merely an academic exercise; it affects how believers interact with and understand the Bible's reliability and authority.
Harmony Within the Text
The quest for harmony among biblical texts is critical for maintaining the doctrine of inerrancy, engaging scholars and theologians alike. Howe argues that different temporal references in the Gospels, such as the account of the transfiguration, may be reconciled by understanding how authors prioritize thematic content over chronological precision. He illustrates this with the idea that various Gospel writers provided accounts to convey theological truths rather than strict historical timelines. By employing a more nuanced approach to interpreting scripture, believers are encouraged to seek coherence within the biblical narrative rather than viewing contradictions as insurmountable.
The Historical Perspective on Inerrancy
The assertion that the doctrine of inerrancy is a modern construct dismisses historical perspectives prevalent throughout church history. Howe references the writings of early church fathers, such as Augustine and Irenaeus, who affirmed the reliability and integrity of the scriptures. By highlighting these ancient affirmations, it becomes clear that concerns over biblical accuracy and truthfulness are not unique to contemporary discussions but have long been an integral part of Christian thought. This historical reflection demonstrates that the doctrine of inerrancy emerges from a rich tradition of valuing scripture as divinely inspired and authoritative.
Join us as we dive deep into biblical inerrancy and what "without error" really means with Dr. Richard G. Howe, Norman L. Geisler Chair of Christian Apologetics at Southern Evangelical Seminary and Past President of the International Society of Christian Apologetics. Drawing from decades of experience defending the Christian faith on university campuses and international platforms, Dr. Howe provides a philosophically robust framework for understanding Scripture’s truthfulness.
From his correspondence theory of truth to the relationship between divine inspiration and inerrancy, we’ll explore how God’s nature necessarily implies an errorless Bible, examine the difference between legitimate literary devices and historical alterations, and wrestle with how to approach apparent discrepancies in the Gospels. As both a philosopher and theologian, Dr. Howe brings unique insights to this crucial doctrine that grounds our faith.
Whether you’re wrestling with difficult passages or seeking a deeper understanding of biblical authority, this conversation offers crucial insights into how we read and trust God’s Word.
✨Episode Sponsored by Logos Bible Software - The all new Logos is now easier to use and more accessible than ever with monthly plans starting at $9.99. Visit https://www.logos.com/remnant to get started for FREE with an exclusive extended free trial of up to 60-days!
🌐📧 Visit our Website & Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://www.theremnantradio.com