Dive into the intriguing clash of ideas between Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn, exploring how their theories shape our understanding of scientific inquiry. The discussion reveals the nuances of falsificationism and paradigm shifts, highlighting the importance of skepticism in evaluating evidence. Delve into the evolving landscape of scientific theories, the impact of the replication crisis, and the integration of Bayesian statistics for a modern perspective. The speakers humorously tackle the tension between established beliefs and the pursuit of objective truth in science.
01:10:24
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
menu_book Books
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
The Problem of Induction
The problem of induction, raised by David Hume, questions our ability to predict the future based on past observations.
This problem arises because our reasoning is circular: we assume the future resembles the past because it always has.
insights INSIGHT
Popper's Falsificationism
Karl Popper argued that science progresses through falsification, not confirmation.
Theories are tested, and those that withstand rigorous testing are corroborated, but not necessarily more likely to be true.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Golgi Apparatus Anecdote
Tom and Stuart discuss a story about the Golgi apparatus and a lecturer who admitted being wrong about its existence.
This anecdote highlights the importance of admitting mistakes and revising theories in the face of new evidence.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Written by Bertrand Russell, this book is a dazzlingly unique exploration of the ideologies of significant philosophers throughout the ages. It traces philosophy from the rise of Greek civilization to the emergence of logical analysis in the twentieth century. The book is divided into three main sections: Ancient Philosophy, Catholic Philosophy, and Modern Philosophy. Russell provides historical context and clear, often witty, descriptions of the major life events, ideas, and influences of the philosophers he covers. Despite some criticisms for overgeneralizations and biases, the book remains a popular and commercially successful work, praised for its clarity, erudition, and grace[2][3][5].
Everything Is Predictable
How Bayes’ Remarkable Theorem Explains the World
George Orwell
The Knowledge Machine
How Irrationality Created Modern Science
Karl Popper
An enquiry concerning human understanding
David Hume
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Thomas Kuhn
In 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions', Thomas S. Kuhn argues that scientific progress does not occur through a gradual accumulation of facts, but rather through periodic revolutions that disrupt existing paradigms. Kuhn introduces the concept of 'normal science' and 'revolutionary science', where normal science involves puzzle-solving within an established paradigm, and revolutionary science involves a paradigm shift that fundamentally changes the way scientists view the world. He explains that these revolutions are driven by the accumulation of anomalies that cannot be explained by the current paradigm, leading to a crisis and eventually a new paradigm that offers a different perspective and new ways of conducting research[1][3][5].
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
Karl Popper
Karl Popper's "The Logic of Scientific Discovery" is a highly influential work in the philosophy of science. It critiques the traditional view of scientific method as inductive, arguing instead that scientific knowledge is developed through a process of conjecture and refutation. Popper introduces the concept of falsifiability, suggesting that a scientific theory must be testable and potentially falsifiable to be considered scientific. The book has had a profound impact on the philosophy of science, influencing the way scientists approach the development and testing of theories. It remains a cornerstone of modern epistemology.
It had to happen eventually: this week The Studies Show is all about philosophy. As we look at science in general, how do we decide what those studies are actually showing?
Tom and Stuart take a look at the Big Two of philosophy of science: Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn, with their respective theories of falsificationism and paradigm shifts. Both are theories that almost everyone interested in science has heard of—but both make far more extreme claims than you might think.
The Studies Show is sponsored by Works in Progress magazine, the best place to go online for fact-rich, data-dense articles on science and technology, and how they’ve made the world a better place—or how they might do so in the future. To find all their essays, all for free, go to worksinprogress.co.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thestudiesshowpod.com/subscribe
The Studies Show 
