Trump/Harris Debate PROVES We Have a State-Run Media | Guests: Megyn Kelly & Julio Rosas | 9/11/24
Sep 11, 2024
auto_awesome
Megyn Kelly, a prominent journalist known for her incisive political commentary, and Julio Rosas, a noted reporter on political events, dive deep into the glaring media bias displayed during the recent Trump-Harris debate. They discuss Kamala Harris's numerous misleading claims and the moderators' one-sided fact-checking. Kelly passionately critiques the implications of state-run media on public discourse. Additionally, Rosas sheds light on the challenges of Haitian immigration in Springfield, revealing community tensions around integration and public safety.
The podcast critiques the evident bias of ABC News moderators during the Trump/Harris debate, highlighting their unequal fact-checking approach.
A detailed analysis reveals 25 specific lies attributed to Kamala Harris during the debate, raising concerns over unchecked political rhetoric.
Broader shifts in sentiment among traditional Democrat voters indicate potential electoral dynamics, driven by discontent with current administration policies.
Deep dives
Health Benefits of Rough Greens
Rough Greens is introduced as a nutritional supplement designed for dogs, containing essential components like probiotics and antioxidants. It is a sprinkle additive that enhances the health of pets by improving what they eat, contrary to traditional plain dog food, which lacks nutritional value. The host humorously expresses reservations about promoting its use for cats, while highlighting the available free trial for consumers at roughgreens.com. The emphasis is on the health benefits that pets can gain from such a supplement.
Criticism of Moderators During the Debate
A significant critique is leveled at the moderators of the debate for their perceived bias and ineffective management of the discourse. The host notes that while Kamala Harris's unchallenged falsehoods went unchecked, Donald Trump's comments were frequently interrupted and fact-checked. This disparity is framed as indicative of a biased media system that fails to uphold journalistic integrity. The discussion raises concerns about the credibility of debate formats under such conditions, questioning the fairness of the electoral process.
List of Lies Told by Kamala Harris
A detailed analysis is presented, identifying multiple inaccuracies in Kamala Harris's statements during the debate. The speaker references a source that outlines 25 specific lies attributed to her, including misrepresentations regarding her upbringing, tax policies, and healthcare claims. It is emphasized that these fabrications were not addressed by the moderation team, resulting in an unbalanced narrative. The discussion captures a deeper concern regarding the implications of unchecked political rhetoric and its effects on public perception.
Defending Trump Against Accusations
The host discusses how Kamala Harris made numerous accusations against Donald Trump that are fundamentally flawed, asserting that they stem from a disassociation with reality. For instance, the debate claims that Trump contributed to the worst public health crisis and economic woes are highlighted as taking the blame away from other systemic failures. Furthermore, Trump's approach to handling international relations is framed positively in contrast to Harris's rhetoric, emphasizing patriotism and America's success. This analysis encourages listeners to consider the broader consequences of these statements in terms of political truth and accountability.
The Impact of Political Lies
The ongoing discussion illustrates the pervasive nature of misinformation in political discourse, with an emphasis on how this trend can harm democratic processes. The speaker underscores that political lies contributed by prepared candidates lead to deep-seated public mistrust in the system. This is tied to a fear that the public may become desensitized or apathetic in the face of continuous falsehoods, ultimately eroding faith in candidates and governance. It serves as a call-to-action to engage voters critically and ensure they question the narratives being presented.
Voter Sentiment Shifts
Insights from relatives and friends suggest a noticeable shift in sentiment among traditional Democrat voters who are increasingly disillusioned with current administration policies. The conversation highlights how economic challenges and the handling of immigration are causing these individuals to reconsider their political allegiance. Furthermore, there’s a recognition that disillusionment with longstanding political affiliations can lead to unexpected electoral dynamics. The speaker expresses hope that these sentiments could translate into increased support for alternative candidates in the upcoming elections.
The ABC News bias was on full display during yesterday's debate, as the moderators fact-checked Trump multiple times while Kamala Harris got away with lie after lie. Glenn goes through the Federalist's fact-check of the 25 lies Kamala Harris claimed during the debate. Pat Gray joins Glenn and Stu to dissect Kamala's debate lies and discuss the bias of the ABC debate moderators. With Kamala Harris being so confident lying to the American people, is this a sign of a state-run media? Journalist and former debate moderator Megyn Kelly joins to rant and vent about the one-sided fact-checking the ABC debate moderators engaged in. Glenn gives his realization of Kamala Harris' strategy of projection and denial. Blaze Media national correspondent Julio Rosas joins to report the facts on the Haitian influx happening in Springfield, Ohio. Glenn takes calls from viewers to gauge their feelings on the debate and who they thought came out on top.
