Sky News Daily Trans women not legally women say judges – what changes now?
6 snips
Apr 16, 2025 In this discussion, legal commentator Joshua Rosenberg delves into the UK Supreme Court's ruling that defines 'woman' based on biological sex, igniting fierce debate over trans rights. He explains the implications of this decision for the Equality Act 2010 and how it affects both women’s rights and trans individuals' access to single-sex spaces. Rosenberg also highlights the mixed reactions from campaigners, showcasing the delicate balance between legal recognition and societal impact in this contentious landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Legal Definition of Woman
- The Supreme Court ruled that in law, the term woman refers to biological sex, not gender identity.
- This interpretation brings legal clarity distinguishing biological women from trans women regarding rights under the Equality Act.
Trans People Still Protected Legally
- The Supreme Court emphasized trans people remain legally protected from discrimination despite ruling on biological sex.
- Protection stems from the Equality Act under gender reassignment, harassment, and indirect discrimination provisions.
Ruling Aligns With Societal Expectations
- The ruling largely reflects existing societal expectations that women means biological women.
- It does not block the Scottish government's aim to increase women representation on public boards.