WTF did the Supreme Court Just Do with Leah Litman and Kate Shaw of Strict Scrutiny
Jul 10, 2024
auto_awesome
Law professors Leah Litman and Kate Shaw from the 'Strict Scrutiny' podcast join Adam to dissect recent Supreme Court decisions, delving into the erosion of accountability, presidential immunity, climate change, and democracy. They discuss the implications of conservative courts limiting agency power, call for institutional reforms, and analyze the Democratic Party's cautious stance on altering the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court rulings favor corporate power over federal agencies, impacting government functions.
Presidential immunity rulings raise concerns about unchecked executive power and legal accountability.
Calls for Supreme Court reforms highlight concerns about ideological shifts and lack of accountability in decision-making.
Deep dives
Overview of Supreme Court Decisions
Recent Supreme Court decisions have dramatically reshaped American government, emphasizing corporate power and limiting agency authority. Decisions like restricting SEC's power, halting EPA rules, and overturning Chevron rule are seen as a significant judicial power grab favoring corporations over federal agencies.
Implications of Supreme Court's Immunity Decision
The recent Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity has raised concerns about broad immunity for a sitting or former president. Experts highlight the potential consequences, such as delaying prosecutions of ex-presidents or shielding them from legal accountability, signaling a concerning shift favoring presidential power.
Challenges to Supreme Court's Legitimacy
The Supreme Court's actions, especially in recent years, have sparked questions about its legitimacy and impact on democracy. The court's conservative supermajority's decisions, like those on Roe v. Wade, have fueled concerns about ideological shifts and lack of accountability, leading to calls for reforms.
Proposed Reforms for the Supreme Court
Suggestions for reforming the Supreme Court include adding seats to balance the conservative supermajority, imposing term limits, and enhancing ethics regulations for justices. These reforms aim to address concerns about the court's unchecked power and potential bias in decision-making.
Promoting Public Awareness and Engagement
Promoting public awareness of the Supreme Court's role and impact on democracy is essential for advocating change. Increasing discussions on the court's functioning, limitations, and repercussions of its decisions can spark broader conversations and drive support for reforms.
Calls for Democratic Engagement and Action
Encouraging democratic engagement and action, such as voting for candidates advocating Supreme Court reforms, remains crucial. Addressing the court's overreach and lack of accountability requires collective efforts to reshape its role and ensure a fair and balanced judicial system.
The latest round of Supreme Court decisions will radically reshape America as we know it. From overturning the Chevron decision and stripping federal agencies of their ability to do their jobs, to giving presidents broad immunity for actions that would otherwise be considered criminal, it can be hard to fully grasp the impact of these rulings, both immediately and in the future. This week, Adam speaks with Leah Litman and Kate Shaw, law professors and hosts of the podcast "Strict Scrutiny," to make sense of how the Supreme Court has sold out our future and what, if anything, can be done to restore the court to its proper function.
About Headgum: Headgum is an LA & NY-based podcast network creating premium podcasts with the funniest, most engaging voices in comedy to achieve one goal: Making our audience and ourselves laugh. Listen to our shows at https://www.headgum.com.