The Counsel of Trent #1077 - A Case for Infant Baptism (Gavin Ortlund Response)
39 snips
Sep 8, 2025 Dive into the rich history of infant baptism as the speaker unpacks its early Christian roots. Learn about the profound influence of Augustine and early writers like Cyprian and Tertullian, showcasing the complexities of baptism's interpretation. Historical perspectives reveal ongoing debates surrounding who should be baptized and at what age. The theological case for baptizing infants is compellingly defended, challenging contemporary practices and offering insights into ancient beliefs.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Theological Case Over Historical Proof
- Trent Horn argues the strongest case for infant baptism is theological, not merely historical.
- He ties infant baptism to baptismal regeneration and necessity of baptism for salvation.
Baptism's Purpose Determines Recipients
- Horn frames the argument: baptism effects spiritual regeneration and thus should be applied to those needing it.
- Therefore, infants should be baptized because all people need regeneration and baptism accomplishes it.
Differentiate Doctrine From Discipline
- Distinguish doctrine from discipline when evaluating early church practices and silence in sources.
- Treat infant baptism as a discipline that can lag behind doctrinal clarity in historical records.
