Parker's Pensées Ep. 274 - Can Philosophers Disprove the Simulation Hypothesis? w/Dr. Brian Cutter
Sep 13, 2025
Join Dr. Brian Cutter, a philosophy professor at Notre Dame, as he dives into the profound implications of the simulation hypothesis. He passionately discusses whether we might be living in a computer-generated reality and explores consciousness beyond biological existence. The conversation challenges the indifference principle and tackles philosophical arguments from thinkers like Nick Bostrom. Cutter also examines the tension between personal belief and statistical reasoning, making a compelling case for why this topic is more than just science fiction.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Early Matrix Moment
- Brian first encountered the simulation idea after seeing The Matrix as a teen and found it philosophically gripping.
- He later read Nick Bostrom in grad school and took the hypothesis seriously enough to teach it.
What The Simulation Hypothesis Claims
- The simulation hypothesis posits we inhabit a virtual world implemented by higher-level beings.
- It doesn't require a biological brain in base reality; consciousness could be generated by simulated brain processes.
Substrate Independence Is Key
- Bostrom relies on substrate independence: consciousness arises from abstract causal organization, not specific materials.
- If true, many simulations could generate conscious beings, leading to a statistical argument that we probably are sims.
