Exploring the feasibility of eliminating Hamas as a military objective in Israel's war with Hamas. Comparisons between Hamas and ISIS, focusing on their different roots and tactics. The challenges of urban warfare and the extensive tunnel network used by Hamas. The speaker's experience in Mosul and the dilemma of targeting hospitals. The different potential outcomes in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas.
Eliminating Hamas completely may not be a realistic military goal, but rather a strategy to severely weaken their capabilities and prevent future attacks.
Urban warfare presents unique challenges, requiring a higher ratio of forces and careful consideration of civilian structures in targeting decisions.
Deep dives
Hamas vs ISIS: A Comparison of Objectives and Tactics
Hamas and ISIS should not be directly compared, as they have different objectives and fight in different ways. While ISIS aims to establish an Islamic caliphate and fight from outside territories, Hamas is a Palestinian-based organization fighting for what they see as the liberation and elimination of Israel. Hamas fights from within Gaza, their home base, while ISIS fought from outside cities like Mosul. Eliminating Hamas completely may not be a realistic military goal, but rather a strategy to severely weaken their capabilities and prevent future attacks.
Challenges of Urban Warfare in Gaza and Mosul
Urban warfare presents unique challenges for military operations. Both Gaza and Mosul have shown that maneuvering in densely populated cities and rubble-filled environments is incredibly difficult. Soldiers must navigate obstacles and identify enemy positions among civilians. The ratio of forces needed in urban areas is higher than in rural areas, often requiring a significant advantage for the attacker. Additionally, tunnels pose a significant threat, especially in Gaza where Hamas has an extensive network. Targeting decisions must consider the protection of civilian structures like hospitals, while also addressing the military necessity to remove Hamas fighters.
Possible Scenarios and the Need for Diplomatic Solutions
Multiple scenarios can unfold in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. The best-case scenario would involve the Israeli Defense Force achieving its objectives swiftly, potentially transitioning to a follow-on force or an Arab transition force. However, a worst-case scenario includes a long, drawn-out military operation with increased casualties and a broader conflict if other fronts open up. Ultimately, diplomatic efforts and a commitment to a genuine peace process are necessary to find a long-term solution and renewed conversation about a two-state solution.
Last night Israel's military said its forces had "advanced another significant stage in the war" and encircled Gaza City, the most built-up area of the Gaza Strip and the heart of the Hamas tunnel network.
Israel's government says the purpose of the war is to eliminate Hamas, but is that an objective that can be achieved? We speak to a former major-general who was once the UK's most senior commander in Iraq, tasked with eliminating Isis.
This podcast was brought to you thanks to the support of readers of The Times and The Sunday Times. Subscribe today: thetimes.co.uk/storiesofourtimes.
Guest: Major-General Rupert Jones (ret’d).
Host: Manveen Rana.
Get in touch: storiesofourtimes@thetimes.co.uk
Clips: Global News, Channel 4 News, BBC News, CNN, PBS NewsHour, Sky News Australia.