AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Nan Patterson, an actress, had a tumultuous relationship with Caesar Young. They met on a train and began a passionate affair while Caesar was still married. Despite various attempts to end the relationship, they continued to see each other. On the morning of June 4, 1904, before leaving for a trip with his wife, Caesar met with Nan one last time. In a cab, an argument ensued, and Caesar was found dead with a gunshot wound in his chest. Nan claimed it was a suicide, but suspicion arose due to rumored threatening letters and witnesses who contradicted her story. She was indicted for murder and held without bail.
The case garnered significant media attention, with various unfounded claims and rumors swirling around Nan Patterson. The district attorney's office made vague claims of evidence against her, but failed to produce solid proof. Witnesses provided conflicting accounts of the shooting, and the jury requested to hear Nan's side of the story. Her legal team advised against it, and the grand jury indicted her for first-degree murder. Despite a lack of substantial evidence, Nan was portrayed in the press as an unsavory character due to her profession as an actress.
Nan Patterson pleaded not guilty to the murder charges on June 21, 1904. The grand jury's indictment and the media's portrayal of her as guilty led to a controversial trial. Nan's refusal to testify, though done to avoid potential risks, may have further harmed her case. The jury ultimately believed the prosecution's arguments, and Nan's plea of not guilty was unsuccessful. The lack of concrete evidence and the media frenzy surrounding the case cast significant doubt on the fairness of the trial.
Despite the conviction, doubts remained about Nan Patterson's guilt in the murder of Caesar Young. The case and trial were clouded by rumors, unfounded claims, and a lack of concrete evidence. The true nature of Caesar's death and Nan's involvement in it remain uncertain. The case underscores the challenges of obtaining a fair trial and the power of media influence. Nan's future is left uncertain, as the reality of her guilt or innocence may never be fully resolved.
Despite three trials and a year in jail, Nan Patterson was ultimately released as a free woman. The jury in all three trials were deadlocked, as there was no unanimous agreement on her guilt or innocence. The main points of contention centered around the gun residue found on Caesar Young's fingers and the lack thereof on Nan's hands, suggesting that she did not shoot him. The defense argued that the shooting may have been an accident, while the prosecution maintained that Nan was motivated by jealousy and sought to escape conviction by portraying herself as an innocent victim.
Nan Patterson's story involved conflicting testimonies and dubious evidence. The defense asserted that the trajectory of the bullet and the presence of gun residue on Caesar's fingers indicated that he shot himself. However, the prosecution argued that Nan had a motive for murder and manipulated the events to her advantage. The three trials were marked by dramatic revelations, such as the involvement of Nan's sister and brother-in-law, who supposedly purchased the gun used in the shooting. Despite the confusion, Nan's release after the third mistrial further deepened the mystery surrounding the case.
After multiple trials and a year in jail, Nan Patterson was released and faded into obscurity. The jury's inability to reach a unanimous verdict in her favor raised questions about her guilt or innocence. Nan's version of events, claiming an accidental shooting, clashed with the prosecution's theory of premeditated murder. The lack of concrete evidence and conflicting testimonies made it nearly impossible to determine the truth behind Caesar Young's death. Nan's subsequent marriages and eventual passing in 1947 at the age of 65 left the case unresolved and shrouded in mystery.
In the early morning hours of June 4, 1904, New York City police were called to Lower Manhattan for what they were told was the death of Frank “Ceasar” Young from a self-inflicted gunshot wound to his chest. When they arrived at the scene, they found Young’s body in the back of a Hansom cab, slumped over into the lap of a young actress named Nan Patterson, with whom he’d been having an affair. Nan claimed Young had shot himself when she refused to accompany him back to England, where he was headed to meet his wife that morning, but the police believed otherwise, and Nan was arrested and charged with Young’s murder.
What followed was not one, but three sensational murder trials that commanded the attention of New Yorkers across all five boroughs, and all of them had an opinion about Nan Patterson and her relationship with Caesar Young.
Thank you to the fantastical David White, of Bring me the Axe podcast, for research assistance :)
References
Allen, Oliver. 2017. When today's Tribeca was the site of a most sensational murder. November 15. Accessed August 30, 2023. www.tribecatrib.com/content/when-todays-tribeca-was-site-most-sensational-murder.
New York Times . 1904. "Nan Patterson hears the case against her." The New York Times, November 22: 6.
New York Times. 1904. "Bookmaker is shot in cab with actress." New York Times, June 5: 1.
—. 1904. "Actress recommitted at Jerome's insistance." The New York Times, June 7: 2.
—. 1904. "Aged witness speaks for Nan Patterson." The New York Times, November 2: 16.
—. 1904. "Allows Nan Patterson bail." The New York Times, September 2: 14.
—. 1905. "Choose married men for Patterson case." The New York Times, April 19: 20.
—. 1904. "Coroner says Nan Patterson is guilty." The New York Times, June 9: 2.
—. 1905. "Disagreement in Patterson case." The New York Times, May 4: 1.
—. 1905. "Indictment against Morgan Smiths quashed." The New York Times, May 6: 16.
—. 1905. "Misdirected sympathy." The New York Times, January 2: 6.
—. 1904. "Nan Patterson case results in mistrial." The New York Times, December 24: 14.
—. 1905. "Nan Patterson Free." The New York Times, May 13: 3.
—. 1905. "Nan Patterson free; Jerome blames press." The New York Times, May 13: 3.
—. 1904. "Nan Patterson swears Young shot himself." The New York Times, December 20: 1.
—. 1904. "Nan Patterson will not answer questions." The New York Times, June 10: 3.
—. 1904. "Nan Patterson's trial to begin again Monday." The New York Times, November 29: 4.
—. 1904. "New Patterson trial soon." The New York Times, December 25: 11.
—. 1904. "Patterson counsel witness at trial." The New York Times, December 10: 16.
—. 1904. "Rand highly praised for closing address." The New York Times, December 22: 6.
—. 1904. "Rand springs surprise in Nan Patterson case." The New York Times, December 14: 16.
—. 1904. "The Nan Patterson case, letter to the editor." The New York Times, December 30: 8.
—. 1904. "Witness corroborates Hazelton's version." The New York Times, November 3: 16.
—. 1904. "Witness ill, may halt Nan Patterson trial." The New York Times, November 19: 5.
—. 1904. "Young, witness says, hit Nan Patterson." The New York Times, November 24: 4.
New York Tmes. 1904. "Skeleton in court in Young case." The New York Times, November 23: 5.
San Francisco Call. 1904. "'Caesar' Young, the Californian slain while riding in cab with actress." The San Francisco Call, June 5: 21.
San Francisco Chronicle . 1904. "Young's death still puzzling." San Francisco Chronicle, June 6: 1.
San Francisco Chronicle. 1904. "Young's death still puzzling." San Francisco Chronicle , June 6: 1.
Segrave, Kerry. 2020. Death in a Hansom Cab; The 1904 Persecution of Nan Patterson. Cheltinham, UK: History Press.
The Washington Times. 1904. "Nan Patterson's mother very ill." The Washington Times, June 6: 1.
Woolcott, Alexander. 1930. "The mystery of the Hansom cab." The New Yorker, May 3: 36-44.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode