Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts “No Right Is Safe”
35 snips
Jun 28, 2025 Recent Supreme Court rulings signal a troubling trend for constitutional protections. The hosts explore how individuals are now expected to pursue their own legal remedies, highlighting the hurdles faced in accessing justice. They discuss the implications of rulings on birthright citizenship, LGBTQ rights in education, and the erosion of judicial authority. Additionally, the critical dissent from Justice Jackson raises alarms about the rollback of civil rights, while discussions on healthcare highlight the tension between religious liberties and societal needs.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Nationwide Injunctions Are Restricted
- The Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. CASA severely limits courts' ability to issue nationwide injunctions.
- This increases the burden on individuals to sue the government personally to protect their rights.
Prioritizing Power Over Constitution
- The Supreme Court majority prioritized limiting injunctions over stopping unconstitutional policies.
- This choice enables potential chaos with uneven application of birthright citizenship law across states.
Dissent Warns of Democracy's End
- Dissenting justices warn the decision threatens American democracy and the rule of law.
- The majority dismisses these concerns with arrogance and contempt.
