

Trump's Successful Iran Mission, and the MAGA Case For and Against Strikes, with Emily Jashinsky and Victor Davis Hanson | Ep. 1093
50 snips Jun 23, 2025
Victor Davis Hanson, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and military historian, joins commentator Emily Jashinsky to discuss Trump's strategic airstrike on Iran's nuclear sites. They delve into the criticisms from both the far left and MAGA right, contrasting them with historical reactions to Obama's actions. They also analyze Iran's retaliatory strikes, the potential political fallout, and the implications for U.S. foreign policy. Additionally, Jashinsky shares her insights on the impact of celebrity political opinions amidst geopolitical tensions.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Iran's Threat and Timing of Strike
- Iran has been the top state sponsor of terror against the U.S. for 46 years and actively killed American troops.
- Trump's strike was timely because Iran and its proxies were significantly weakened, making the operation less provocative than before.
Degradation of Iran's Power
- Israel and the U.S. crippled Iran's proxies like Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis significantly in recent years.
- Iran's capability for retaliation and nuclear progress has been greatly degraded, making it less formidable than before.
Legal Authority for Trump's Strike
- Trump acted within constitutional and congressional authority, justified under the post-9/11 Authorization for Use of Military Force.
- Targeted strikes do not equate to a war declaration needing Congress approval.