

Should the ICC Prosecute Putin?
Jul 23, 2023
In this discussion, Daniel Krcmaric, an academic and author focused on international justice, dives into the complexities surrounding the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin. He examines the challenges of prosecuting a sitting leader, the implications for international law, and the historical context of accountability post-Nuremberg. The conversation raises vital questions about the balance between justice and peace, and the potential double standards in how leaders are treated under international law.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
ICC Jurisdiction in Ukraine
- The ICC can prosecute crimes committed in Ukraine if Ukraine doesn't investigate or prosecute them.
- This applies to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, given Ukraine's ICC involvement.
Case for Prosecuting Putin
- Prosecuting Putin at the ICC supports Ukrainians and deters future war crimes.
- It also strengthens the ICC's legitimacy by holding powerful figures accountable.
ICC Legitimacy and Double Standards
- The ICC's legitimacy isn't solely tied to Putin's prosecution, but the focus on him reinforces double standards.
- Lack of prosecutions for crimes in other conflicts weakens the ICC's standing in the Global South.