The Real Robin Hood May Have Been an Anglo-Saxon Hitman Who Killed an English King
Aug 15, 2024
auto_awesome
Peter Staveley, author of "Robin Unhooded, And the Death of a King," presents a bold theory that redefines Robin Hood as an Anglo-Saxon hitman linked to the assassination of King William II. He challenges the traditional Merry Man narrative, proposing that Robin operated in the backdrop of the Norman Conquest and particularly in South Yorkshire. The discussion dives into the intriguing connections between Robin's actions and the political dynamics of the time, as well as the mysterious circumstances surrounding King Rufus's death.
Peter Staveley presents a provocative theory that Robin Hood was an Anglo-Saxon hitman responsible for the assassination of King William II, redefining the legend's historical context.
The podcast emphasizes how modern interpretations of Robin Hood often overlook his potentially violent past and complex motivations tied to personal vendettas and political upheaval.
Deep dives
The Historical Context of Robin Hood
The legend of Robin Hood has undergone numerous interpretations since its inception in 14th-century English ballads. Many historians argue that Robin Hood is either a fictional character or based on a loosely defined historical figure, akin to King Arthur. However, Peter Stavely presents a compelling argument that the true inspiration for Robin Hood existed in the late 11th century, during the tumultuous period following the Norman Conquest. This recontextualization not only shifts the timeline but also suggests an Anglo-Saxon Robin who would have been far removed from the aristocratic depictions common in modern narratives.
The Origins of the Legend
The podcast delves into the origins of the Robin Hood myth, highlighting that much of what is commonly accepted today has been shaped by 19th and 20th-century interpretations rather than the original sources. Only a handful of surviving ballads from earlier centuries detail his exploits, with little mention of key figures like King Richard or his noble persona. Most early accounts lack solid historical context, which has led to prolonged speculation regarding his existence and character. This exploration emphasizes how contemporary portrayals often overlook the less-glamorous roots of the story.
A New Perspective on Robin Hood's Actions
Challenging the conventional view of Robin Hood as a benevolent outlaw stealing from the rich to give to the poor, Stavely proposes an alternative narrative where Robin Hood takes on a more violent role. He suggests that Robin may have participated in the assassination of King William Rufus, reflecting a much darker, pragmatic approach to justice within the chaotic political landscape of the time. This theory reframes Robin Hood as a character who is driven by personal and familial vendettas rather than the altruistic motivations attributed to him in popular culture. The implications of this perspective complicate our understanding of Robin Hood's legacy and the reasons behind his notoriety.
The Legacy of Robin Hood
The podcast concludes by considering how this reevaluation of Robin Hood's character and origins might reshape the mythos surrounding him. Stavely argues that, rather than being a straightforward hero, Robin Hood's mythos encompasses a complicated history of social justice that is deeply entwined with his family's lineage and the political turmoil of medieval England. He indicates that the legend might reflect broader themes of resilience and rebellion against oppressive rulers, which have echoed throughout history. This rich narrative not only enhances our understanding of Robin Hood himself but also engages with important discussions about freedom, justice, and the nature of heroism in society.
Contrary to popular belief, Robin Hood may not have been the merry medieval outlaw of Sherwood Forest. Rather, a look at real historical figures who inspired the legend are narrowed down to the most unlikely suspect: an Anglo-Saxon hitman who may have assassinated the King of England.
Today’s guest, Peter Staveley, proposes that Robin Hood lived during the time of William II (near the time of the Norman conquest of England in 1066), rather than Richard I and Prince John of the late 1100s. He argues that Robin was responsible for the death of William II, also known as Rufus, in what was long considered a hunting accident in the New Forest in 1100. This act conveniently paved the way for William’s brother to ascend the throne as Henry I. Staveley places Robin deep within the geography of South Yorkshire, with strong ties to historic Hallamshire, Loxley, Bradfield, and Ecclesfield, challenging the traditional narrative and the long-held association with Nottingham.
We explore how Yorkshire, particularly Sheffield, might reclaim the legacy of Robin Hood from Nottingham and reveal the true, rougher man behind the legend.
Staveley is author of “Robin Unhooded, And the Death of a King.”