Brain in a Vat Cultural Appropriation | Stephen Kershnar (Rebroadcast)
Sep 30, 2025
In this thought-provoking discussion, philosopher Stephen Kershnar challenges the conventional view of cultural appropriation. He argues that appropriation can be permissible and even beneficial, enhancing market efficiency and cultural exchange. Through intriguing thought experiments involving burrito carts and prom dresses, Kershnar debates whether cultural practices can be owned and explores the ethics surrounding potentially sacred symbols. The conversation takes a turn as they assess the balance between respecting cultural significance and the freedom of expression.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Burrito Cart And Prom Dress Examples
- Kershnar opens with examples: two white women opening a burrito cart and a Utah senior wearing a Chinese dress to prom.
- These cases introduce his claim that cultural appropriation is often permissible and sometimes good.
Ideas Aren't Property
- Stephen Kershnar argues people cannot literally own abstract ideas or cultural designs.
- He says ownership of ideas conflicts with ownership of concrete particulars and lacks clear decision procedures.
IP Is A Legal Tool, Not A Natural Right
- Kershnar contends intellectual property rights are legal, consequential constructs not metaphysical rights.
- He points out IP is time-limited and aimed at balancing incentives and dissemination.
